Horizon / Plein textes La base de ressources documentaires de l'IRD

IRD

 

Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Nararak J., Di Giorgio C., Sukkanon C., Mahiou-Leddet V., Ollivier E., Manguin Sylvie, Chareonviriyaphap T. (2020). Excito-repellency and biological safety of beta-caryophyllene oxide against Aedes albopictus and Anopheles dirus (Diptera : Culicidae). Acta Tropica, 210, 105556 [10 p.]. ISSN 0001-706X

Accès réservé (Intranet IRD) Demander le PDF

Lien direct chez l'éditeur doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105556

Titre
Excito-repellency and biological safety of beta-caryophyllene oxide against Aedes albopictus and Anopheles dirus (Diptera : Culicidae)
Année de publication2020
Type de documentArticle référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000563534800015
AuteursNararak J., Di Giorgio C., Sukkanon C., Mahiou-Leddet V., Ollivier E., Manguin Sylvie, Chareonviriyaphap T.
SourceActa Tropica, 2020, 210, p. 105556 [10 p.]. p. 105556 [10 p.] ISSN 0001-706X
RésuméThe activity of beta-caryophyllene oxide as either a contact or noncontact repellent was evaluated against two laboratory strains (Aedes albopictus and Anopheles dirus) using an excito-repellency test system. N, N-Diethyl-3methylbenzamide (DEET) was used as a standard reference baseline for comparative purposes. beta-Caryophyllene oxide and DEET were tested at concentrations of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0% (v/v). In addition, the phototoxic and genotoxic effects of beta-caryophyllene oxide were investigated on Balb/c 3T3 mouse fibroblasts (3T3-L1) and Chinese hamster ovary cell line (CHO-K1). The results demonstrated that the higher concentrations of test compounds (0.5 and 1.0%) produced greater behavioral responses. Aedes albopictus was more sensitive to beta beta-caryophyllene oxide than An. dirus. Moderate avoidance response rates (25-56% escape) of Ae. albopictus at 0.5% and 1.0% beta-caryophyllene oxide were observed in contact and noncontact trials compared with low response rates from An. dirus (26-31% escape). DEET at <= 1% displayed lower irritancy and repellency (1-38%) than beta-caryophyllene oxide when tested against the two mosquito species. Knockdown responses (37%) were only observed in An. dirus exposed to 1% 0-caryophyllene oxide in the contact trial. beta-Caryophyllene oxide did not show any phototoxic potential (PIF= 0.38) nor was there any significant genotoxic response as indicated by no increase in micro-nucleated cells with or without metabolic activation. beta-Caryophyllene oxide could be considered as a safe repellent, effective against mosquitoes.
Plan de classementEntomologie médicale / Parasitologie / Virologie [052] ; Sciences fondamentales / Techniques d'analyse et de recherche [020]
LocalisationFonds IRD [F B010079579]
Identifiant IRDfdi:010079579
Lien permanenthttp://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079579

Export des données

Disponibilité des documents

Télechargment fichier PDF téléchargeable

Lien sur le Web lien chez l'éditeur

Accès réservé en accès réservé

HAL en libre accès sur HAL


Accès aux documents originaux :

Le FDI est labellisé CollEx

Accès direct

Bureau du chercheur

Site de la documentation

Espace intranet IST (accès réservé)

Suivi des publications IRD (accès réservé)

Mentions légales

Services Horizon

Poser une question

Consulter l'aide en ligne

Déposer une publication (accès réservé)

S'abonner au flux RSS

Voir les tableaux chronologiques et thématiques

Centres de documentation

Bondy

Montpellier (centre IRD)

Montpellier (MSE)

Cayenne

Nouméa

Papeete

Abidjan

Dakar

Niamey

Ouagadougou

Tunis

La Paz

Quito