High spatial resolution soil moisture mapping over agricultural field integrating SMAP, IMERG, and Sentinel-1 data in machine learning models

2025

Article référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:001526277800001

Tola D., Bustillos L., Arragan F., Chipana R., Hostache Renaud, Resongles Eléonore, Espinoza-Villar R., Zolá R. P., Uscamayta E., Perez-Flores M., Satgé Frédéric

Remote Sensing, 2025, 17 (13), p. 2129 [19 p.]

Soil moisture content (SMC) is a critical parameter for agricultural productivity, particularly in semi-arid regions, where irrigation practices are extensively used to offset water deficits and ensure decent yields. Yet, the socio-economic and remote context of these regions prevents sufficiently dense SMC monitoring in space and time to support farmers in their work to avoid unsustainable irrigation practices and preserve water resource availability. In this context, our study addresses the challenge of high spatial resolution (i.e., 20 m) SMC estimation by integrating remote sensing datasets in machine learning models. For this purpose, a dataset made of 166 soil samples' SMC along with corresponding SMC, precipitation, and radar signal derived from Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP), Integrated Multi-satellitE Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), and Sentinel-1 (S1), respectively, was used to assess four machine learning models' (Decision Tree-DT, Random Forest-RF, Gradient Boosting-GB, Extreme Gradient Boosting-XGB) reliability for SMC mapping. First, each model was trained/validated using only the coarse spatial resolution (i.e., 10 km) SMAP SMC and IMERG precipitation estimates as independent features, and, second, S1 information (i.e., 20 m) derived from single scenes and/or composite images was added as independent features to highlight the benefit of information (i.e., S1 information) for SMC mapping at high spatial resolution (i.e., 20 m). Results show that integrating S1 information from both single scenes and composite images to SMAP SMC and IMERG precipitation data significantly improves model reliability, as R2 increased by 12% to 16%, while RMSE decreased by 10% to 18%, depending on the considered model (i.e., RF, XGB, DT, GB). Overall, all models provided reliable SMC estimates at 20 m spatial resolution, with the GB model performing the best (R2 = 0.86, RMSE = 2.55%).

Sciences fondamentales / Techniques d'analyse et de recherche [020] ; Santé : généralités [050] ; Télédétection [126]

Fonds IRD [F B010094381]

fdi:010094381