Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Rudasingwa M., De Allegri M., Mphuka C., Chansa C., Yeboah E., Bonnet Emmanuel, Ridde Valéry, Chitah B. M. (2022). Universal health coverage and the poor: to what extent are health financing policies making a difference ? Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in Zambia. BMC Public Health, 22 (1), p. 1546 [11 p.].

Titre du document
Universal health coverage and the poor: to what extent are health financing policies making a difference ? Evidence from a benefit incidence analysis in Zambia
Année de publication
2022
Type de document
Article référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000840311400004
Auteurs
Rudasingwa M., De Allegri M., Mphuka C., Chansa C., Yeboah E., Bonnet Emmanuel, Ridde Valéry, Chitah B. M.
Source
BMC Public Health, 2022, 22 (1), p. 1546 [11 p.]
Background Zambia has invested in several healthcare financing reforms aimed at achieving universal access to health services. Several evaluations have investigated the effects of these reforms on the utilization of health services. However, only one study has assessed the distributional incidence of health spending across different socioeconomic groups, but without differentiating between public and overall health spending and between curative and maternal health services. Our study aims to fill this gap by undertaking a quasi-longitudinal benefit incidence analysis of public and overall health spending between 2006 and 2014. Methods We conducted a Benefit Incidence Analysis (BIA) to measure the socioeconomic inequality of public and overall health spending on curative services and institutional delivery across different health facility typologies at three time points. We combined data from household surveys and National Health Accounts. Results Results showed that public (concentration index of - 0.003; SE 0.027 in 2006 and - 0.207; SE 0.011 in 2014) and overall (0.050; SE 0.033 in 2006 and - 0.169; SE 0.011 in 2014) health spending on curative services tended to benefit the poorer segments of the population while public (0.241; SE 0.018 in 2007 and 0.120; SE 0.007 in 2014) and overall health spending (0.051; SE 0.022 in 2007 and 0.116; SE 0.007 in 2014) on institutional delivery tended to benefit the least-poor. Higher inequalities were observed at higher care levels for both curative and institutional delivery services. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the implementation of UHC policies in Zambia led to a reduction in socioeconomic inequality in health spending, particularly at health centres and for curative care. Further action is needed to address existing barriers for the poor to benefit from health spending on curative services and at higher levels of care.
Plan de classement
Santé : aspects socioculturels, économiques et politiques [056]
Description Géographique
ZAMBIE
Localisation
Fonds IRD [F B010085970]
Identifiant IRD
fdi:010085970
Contact