Horizon / Plein textes La base de ressources documentaires de l'IRD

IRD

 

Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Jankowski F., Louafi S., Kane N. A., Diol M., Camara A. D., Pham Jean-Louis, Berthouly Cécile, Barnaud Adeline. (2020). From texts to enacting practices : defining fair and equitable research principles for plant genetic resources in West Africa. Agriculture and Human Values, [Early access], [12 p.]. ISSN 0889-048X

Accès réservé (Intranet IRD) Demander le PDF

Lien direct chez l'éditeur doi:10.1007/s10460-020-10039-3

Titre
From texts to enacting practices : defining fair and equitable research principles for plant genetic resources in West Africa
Année de publication2020
Type de documentArticle référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000531229500001
AuteursJankowski F., Louafi S., Kane N. A., Diol M., Camara A. D., Pham Jean-Louis, Berthouly Cécile, Barnaud Adeline.
SourceAgriculture and Human Values, 2020, [Early access], p. [12 p.]. p. [12 p.] ISSN 0889-048X
RésuméCollaborative research practices in the field of plant genetic resources must follow the principles of fairness and equity as defined in the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) and in the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture (ITPGRFA). In this context the concepts of fairness and equity generally refer to the substantive and procedural dimensions associated with sharing the benefits of this research. But neither term is clearly defined by these international treaties, and the meanings attributed to the concepts vary among different societies. This paper looks at the question of how to account for the diversity among value systems when conducting research that implicates diverse stakeholders and respects the requirements of fairness and equity. We incorporated an auto-ethnography method developed as part of a multi-stakeholder network involved in research projects on plant genetic resources in West Africa. A theatrical device was used as a framework for testing the principles of fairness and equity, helping us to collectively identify feelings of injustice, and explore the conditions for making collaborative research practices more ethical in ways that respect the perspectives of different stakeholders. In an environment of extensive political and socio-cognitive inequality, this approach makes it possible to explain the criteria relating to interactional justice and expectations in terms of socio-political and socio-emotional benefits. It also invites us to consider the principles of fairness and equity in a framework of ethical competence that goes beyond international directives.
Plan de classementSciences du monde végétal [076] ; Développement scientifique et technique [116]
Descr. géo.AFRIQUE DE L'OUEST
LocalisationFonds IRD [F B010079060]
Identifiant IRDfdi:010079060
Lien permanenthttp://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079060

Export des données

Disponibilité des documents

Télechargment fichier PDF téléchargeable

Lien sur le Web lien chez l'éditeur

Accès réservé en accès réservé

HAL en libre accès sur HAL


Accès aux documents originaux :

Le FDI est labellisé CollEx

Accès direct

Bureau du chercheur

Site de la documentation

Espace intranet IST (accès réservé)

Suivi des publications IRD (accès réservé)

Mentions légales

Services Horizon

Poser une question

Consulter l'aide en ligne

Déposer une publication (accès réservé)

S'abonner au flux RSS

Voir les tableaux chronologiques et thématiques

Centres de documentation

Bondy

Montpellier (centre IRD)

Montpellier (MSE)

Cayenne

Nouméa

Papeete

Abidjan

Dakar

Niamey

Ouagadougou

Tunis

La Paz

Quito