Boudhina N., Zitouna-Chebbi R., Mekki I., Jacob Frédéric, Ben Mechlia N., Masmoudi M., Prevot L. (2018). Evaluating four gap-filling methods for eddy covariance measurements of evapotranspiration over hilly crop fields. Geoscientific Instrumentation Methods and Data Systems, 7 (2), p. 151-167. ISSN 2193-0856.
Titre du document
Evaluating four gap-filling methods for eddy covariance measurements of evapotranspiration over hilly crop fields
Boudhina N., Zitouna-Chebbi R., Mekki I., Jacob Frédéric, Ben Mechlia N., Masmoudi M., Prevot L.
Source
Geoscientific Instrumentation Methods and Data Systems, 2018,
7 (2), p. 151-167 ISSN 2193-0856
Estimating evapotranspiration in hilly watersheds is paramount for managing water resources, especially in semiarid/subhumid regions. The eddy covariance (EC) technique allows continuous measurements of latent heat flux (LE). However, time series of EC measurements often experience large portions of missing data because of instrumental malfunctions or quality filtering. Existing gap-filling methods are questionable over hilly crop fields because of changes in airflow inclination and subsequent aerodynamic properties. We evaluated the performances of different gap-filling methods before and after tailoring to conditions of hilly crop fields. The tailoring consisted of splitting the LE time series beforehand on the basis of upslope and downslope winds. The experiment was setup within an agricultural hilly watershed in northeastern Tunisia. EC measurements were collected throughout the growth cycle of three wheat crops, two of them located in adjacent fields on opposite hillslopes, and the third one located in a flat field. We considered four gap-filling methods: the REddyProc method, the linear regression between LE and net radiation (Rn), the multi-linear regression of LE against the other energy fluxes, and the use of evaporative fraction (EF). Regardless of the method, the splitting of the LE time series did not impact the gap-filling rate, and it might improve the accuracies on LE retrievals in some cases. Regardless of the method, the obtained accuracies on LE estimates after gap filling were close to instrumental accuracies, and they were comparable to those reported in previous studies over flat and mountainous terrains. Overall, REddyProc was the most appropriate method, for both gap-filling rate and retrieval accuracy. Thus, it seems possible to conduct gap filling for LE time series collected over hilly crop fields, provided the LE time series are split beforehand on the basis of upslope-downslope winds. Future works should address consecutive vegetation growth cycles for a larger panel of conditions in terms of climate, vegetation, and water status.
