Wittmann H., von Blanckenburg F., Maurice Laurence, Guyot Jean-Loup, Filizola N., Kubik P. W. (2011). Sediment production and delivery in the Amazon River basin quantified by in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides and recent river loads. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 123 (5-6), p. 934-950. ISSN 0016-7606.
Titre du document
Sediment production and delivery in the Amazon River basin quantified by in situ-produced cosmogenic nuclides and recent river loads
Wittmann H., von Blanckenburg F., Maurice Laurence, Guyot Jean-Loup, Filizola N., Kubik P. W.
Source
Geological Society of America Bulletin, 2011,
123 (5-6), p. 934-950 ISSN 0016-7606
We use cosmogenic nuclide-derived denudation rates from in situ-produced Be-10 in river sediment to determine sediment production rates for the central Amazon River and its major tributaries. Recent developments have shown that this method allows calculating denudation rates in large depositional basins despite intermediate sediment storage, with the result that fluxes of the sediment-producing hinterland can now be linked to those discharged at the basins' outlet. In rivers of the central Amazonian plain, sediment of finer grain sizes (125-500 mu m) yields a weighted cosmogenic nuclide-derived denudation rate of 0.24 +/- 0.02 mm/yr that is comparable to the integrated rate of all main Andean-draining rivers (0.37 +/- 0.06 mm/yr), which are the Beni, Napo, Mamore, Ucayali, and Maranon rivers. Coarser-grained sediment (> 500 mu m) of central Amazonian rivers is indicative of a source from the tectonically stable cratonic headwaters of the Guyana and Brazilian shields, for which the denudation rate is 0.01-0.02 mm/yr. Respective sediment loads can be calculated by converting these cosmogenic nuclide-derived rates using their sediment-producing areas. For the Amazon River at Obidos, a sediment production rate of similar to 610 Mt/yr results; non-Andean source areas contribute only similar to 45 Mt/yr. A comparison with published modern sediment fluxes shows similarities within a factor of similar to 2 with an average gauging-derived sediment load of similar to 1000 Mt/yr at Obidos, for example. We attribute this similar trend in cosmogenic versus modern sediment loads first to the absence of long-term deposition within the basin and second to the buffering capability of the large Amazon floodplain. The buffering capability dampens short-term, high-amplitude fluctuations (climatic variability in source areas and anthropogenic soil erosion) by the time the denudation rate signal of the hinterland is transmitted to the outlet of the basin.
