Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Sagaon Teyssier Luis, Suzan-Monti M., Demoulin B., Capitant C., et al. (2016). Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial. AIDS Care.Psychological and Sociomedical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 28 (S1 No Spécial AIDS Impact), p. 48-55. AIDS Impact Conference Supplement, Amsterdam (NLD), 2015. ISSN 0954-0121.

Titre du document
Uptake of PrEP and condom and sexual risk behavior among MSM during the ANRS IPERGAY trial
Année de publication
2016
Type de document
Article référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000372894500009
Auteurs
Sagaon Teyssier Luis, Suzan-Monti M., Demoulin B., Capitant C., et al.
Source
AIDS Care.Psychological and Sociomedical Aspects of AIDS/HIV, 2016, 28 (S1 No Spécial AIDS Impact), p. 48-55 ISSN 0954-0121
Colloque
AIDS Impact Conference Supplement, Amsterdam (NLD), 2015
The double-blind phase of the randomized ANRS IPERGAY trial, evaluating sexual activity-based oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), was conducted among high-risk men who have sex with men (MSM). Results showed an 86% (95% CI: 40-98) relative reduction in HIV incidence among participants with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate-emtricitabine vs. placebo. The present pooled analysis aimed to analyze (i) participants' adherence to the prescribed treatment and/or condom use during sexual intercourse and (ii) sexual behavior during the double-blind phase of the study. Four hundred MSM were enrolled in the trial. Every 2 months they completed online questionnaires collecting sexual behavior and PrEP adherence data regarding their most recent sexual intercourse. A total of 2232 questionnaires (M0-M24) were analyzed. Changes over time were evaluated using a mixed model accounting for multiple measures. Irrespective of sexual partner and practice type, on average, 42.6% (min: 32.1-max: 45.8%) reported PrEP use only during their most recent episode of sexual intercourse; 29% (22.9-35.6%) reported both PrEP and condom use; 11.7% (7.2-18.9%) reported condom-use only, and 16.7% (10.8-29.6%) reported no PrEP or condom use with no significant change during the study. Scheduled (i.e., correct) PrEP use was reported on average by 59.0% (47.2-68.5%) of those reporting PrEP use during their most recent sexual intercourse. Overall, 70.3% (65.3-79.4%) and 69.3% (58.3-75.4%) of participants reported, respectively, condomless anal and condomless receptive anal intercourse during their most recent sexual encounter without significant change during follow-up. Overall, on average 83.3% (min: 70.4-max: 89.2%) of participants protected themselves by PrEP intake or condom use or both during the trial, and no increase in at-risk sexual practices was observed. None of these indicators showed significant trend during the follow-up, although we found a tendency toward decrease (p = .19) of the median number of sexual partners strengthening the absence of behavioral disinhibition. On-demand PrEP within a comprehensive HIV prevention package could improve prevention in MSM.
Plan de classement
Maladies sexuellement transmissibles [052MALTRA03] ; Sociologie et anthropologie de la santé [056SOCSAN]
Descripteurs
SIDA ; PREVENTION SANITAIRE ; COMPORTEMENT SEXUEL ; TRANSMISSION ; ENQUETE ; HOMOSEXUALITE ; PRESERVATIF
Description Géographique
FRANCE
Localisation
Fonds IRD [F B010074660]
Identifiant IRD
fdi:010074660
Contact