Horizon / Plein textes La base de ressources documentaires de l'IRD

IRD

Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Fréon Pierre, Durand H., Avadi A., Huaranca S., Moreyra R. O. (2017). Life cycle assessment of three Peruvian fishmeal plants : toward a cleaner production. Journal of Cleaner Production, 145, 50-63. ISSN 0959-6526

Accès réservé (Intranet IRD) Document en accès réservé (Intranet IRD)

Lien direct chez l'éditeur doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.036

Titre
Life cycle assessment of three Peruvian fishmeal plants : toward a cleaner production
Année de publication2017
Type de documentArticle référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000394062300006
AuteursFréon Pierre, Durand H., Avadi A., Huaranca S., Moreyra R. O.
SourceJournal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 145, p. 50-63. ISSN 0959-6526
RésuméFishmeal and fish oil are largely used as input to several animal feed industries all around the world, but there is a lack of life cycle assessments (LCAs) on Peruvian fishmeal plants, despite their predominance in the global supply. LCAs where performed on three different types of Peruvian fishmeal plants with the objective of comparing them and suggesting ways of limiting their impacts. The LCA results can be nested into LCAs of animal feed. Two system boundaries were used: one including the fishery and another excluding it in order to enable other practitioners to use our generic life cycle inventory (LCI) data and LCI analysis. The effects of different processing rates and qualities of fishmeal on environmental impacts were compared. We used the SimaPro software, the ecoinvent 2.2 database and the ReCiPe method. In contrast to many LCA studies, the construction and maintenance phases were considered. Despite the predominant impact of the use phase, in particular consumption of fossil energy, these two phases contribute significantly (>10% using the ReCiPe single score) when fishing is excluded from the system boundaries. Furthermore, existing screening LCAs of the use phase largely underestimate (similar to 20%) its environmental impacts. The environmental benefit of using natural gas instead of heavy fuel as energy source, in terms of reduced impacts, is huge, reaching 41% of the ReCiPe single score when fishing is excluded and 30% when included. The comparison of environmental impacts between different qualities of fishmeal shows higher impacts of residual fishmeal, intermediate impact of standard fishmeal and lower impacts of Prime fishmeal, the difference between extreme values being more than twofold. Future studies on other fishmeal and residual fishmeal plants should take into account the construction and maintenance phases, and more items in the use phase than in historical screenings. There is room to decrease the environmental impact of this industry in Peru.
Plan de classementRessources halieutiques [040]
Descr. géo.PEROU
LocalisationFonds IRD [F B010069294]
Identifiant IRDfdi:010069294
Lien permanenthttp://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010069294

Export des données

Disponibilité des documents

Télechargment fichier PDF téléchargeable

Lien sur le Web lien chez l'éditeur

Accès réservé en accès réservé

HAL en libre accès sur HAL


Accès aux documents originaux :

Accès direct

Bureau du chercheur

Site de la documentation

Espace intranet IST (accès réservé)

Suivi des publications IRD (accès réservé)

Mentions légales

Services Horizon

Poser une question

Consulter l'aide en ligne

Déposer une publication (accès réservé)

S'abonner au flux RSS

Voir les tableaux chronologiques et thématiques

Centres de documentation

Bondy

Montpellier (centre IRD)

Montpellier (MSE)

Nouméa

Papeete

Niamey

Ouagadougou

Tunis

La Paz

Quito