@article{fdi:010078989, title = {{R}eintegrating after return : conceptualisation and empirical evidence from the life course of {S}enegalese and {C}ongolese migrants}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}he study of reintegration after return is often disconnected from research into the intention and realization of return. {T}his article develops a new conceptual framework, linking the intention and realization of return with the reintegration process. {T}his framework is used to study the cases of {S}enegalese and {C}ongolese migrants through a mixed-methods approach. {Q}uantitative data from the {M}igration between {A}frica and {E}urope ({MAFE}) project, which collected the life stories of migrants and return migrants in origin and destination countries, are combined with qualitative interviews with returnees. {I}n line with the conceptual framework, the analyses highlight the role of migrants' projections about their potential reintegration on return as well as the importance for reintegration in the preparation for return. {A}long with importance of migrants' aspirations, the authors emphasise the role of external factors, such as family and context in origin and destination countries.}, keywords = {{SENEGAL} ; {EUROPE} ; {REPUBLIQUE} {DEMOCRATIQUE} {DU} {CONGO}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{I}nternational {M}igration}, volume = {59}, numero = {2}, pages = {148--166}, ISSN = {0020-7985}, year = {2021}, DOI = {10.1111/imig.12705}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078989}, } @article{fdi:010080217, title = {{R}evisiter la question du retour au prisme du transnationalisme, des trajectoires, des aspirations et des contraintes}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{FRE}}, abstract = {{D}ans la conclusion, l'auteure propose une lecture personnelle des dif{\'e}rentes contributions de ce num{\'e}ro {\`a} travers un double exercice de mise en perspective th{\'e}orique, en s'appuyant sur ses propres recherches sur les retours en contexte africain. {D}ans un premier temps, elle fait ressortir la mani{\`e}re dont les articles mettent en lien les concepts de "retour" et de "transnationalisme". {D}ans un second temps, {\`a} partir d'{\'e}l{\'e}ments qui ont particuli{\`e}rement retenu son attention, elle discute la fa{\c{c}}on dont la question du retour donne {\`a} voir (a) l'articulation entre les trajectoires familiales, mat{\'e}rielles, professionnelles et migratoires des migrants, (b) le d{\'e}calage entre les aspirations des individus et les contraintes auxquelles ils font face, ainsi que (c) les strat{\'e}gies qu'ils mettent en place face {\`a} ces derni{\`e}res.}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} ; {ANTHROPOLOGIE} {SOCIALE} ; {SYSTEME} {DE} {REPRESENTATIONS} ; {DIASPORA} ; {FAMILLE} ; {RECHERCHE} {SCIENTIFIQUE} ; {MIGRATION} {DE} {RETOUR} ; {TRANSNATIONALISME} ; {ETHNOGRAPHIE} ; {PARCOURS} {MIGRATOIRE} ; {CONCEPT} ; {AFRIQUE} {DE} {L}'{OUEST} ; {SENEGAL} ; {FRANCE}}, booktitle = {{T}ransnationaliser le retour : vers une r{\'e}vision du regard sur les migrations de retour contemporaines}, journal = {Émulations : {R}evue de {S}ciences {S}ociales}, volume = {34}, numero = {}, pages = {143--150}, ISSN = {1784-5734}, year = {2020}, DOI = {10.14428/emulations.034.08}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010080217}, } @article{fdi:010078390, title = {{T}hree sub-{S}aharan migration systems in times of policy restriction}, author = {{B}eauchemin, {C}. and {F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {S}choumaker, {B}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}his paper reviews new evidence on the trends and patterns of migration between {A}frica and {E}urope since the mid-1970s, and discusses their congruency with the changing context of migration policy. {U}sing data from the {D}eterminants of {I}nternational {M}igration ({DEMIG}) and the {M}igration between {A}frica and {E}urope ({MAFE}) projects, we compare flows and policies of three {A}frican and six {E}uropean destination countries ({D}emocratic {R}epublic of {C}ongo, {G}hana, and {S}enegal, on the one hand; and {B}elgium, {F}rance, {I}taly, {S}pain, the {N}etherlands, and the {UK}, on the other). {T}he paper focuses on topics that quantitative studies usually overlook due to the lack of data, namely the propensity to out-migrate, legal status at entry, routes of migration, and propensity to return. {W}e show that times of restrictions in {E}urope do not correspond to less {A}frican out-migration, but rather to more unauthorized migration and fewer returns. {W}e further show that trends in {A}frican migration differ greatly between historical and new destination countries in {E}urope.}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {HISTOIRE} ; {BIOGRAPHIE} ; {RELATIONS} {NORD} {SUD} ; {ANALYSE} {STATISTIQUE} ; {POLITIQUE} {MIGRATOIRE} ; {DYNAMIQUE} {MIGRATOIRE} ; {MIGRATION} {DE} {RETOUR} ; {AFRIQUE} {SUBSAHARIENNE} ; {GHANA} ; {SENEGAL} ; {EUROPE} ; {BELGIQUE} ; {FRANCE} ; {ESPAGNE} ; {ITALIE} ; {PAYS} {BAS} ; {ROYAUME} {UNI} ; {REPUBLIQUE} {DEMOCRATIQUE} {DU} {CONGO}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{C}omparative {M}igration {S}tudies}, volume = {8}, numero = {}, pages = {art. no 19 [27 ]}, ISSN = {2214-594{X}}, year = {2020}, DOI = {10.1186/s40878-020-0174-y}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078390}, } @article{fdi:010077385, title = {{R}eunifying and separating : an analysis of residential arrangements of migrant couples in {O}uagadougou, {B}urkina {F}aso}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {W}ayack-{P}amb{\`e}, {M}. and {S}oura, {A}. {B}. and {C}ompaor{\'e}, {Y}. and {S}anogo, {S}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}his paper offers new evidence on the residential arrangements of couples in the context of migration and urbanisation in {A}frica, focusing on the case of {O}uagadougou, {B}urkina {F}aso's capital city. {W}e use a mixed-methods approach, combining data from a survey on the family histories of migrants merged with data from the {O}uagadougou {H}ealth and {D}emographic {S}urveillance {S}ystem and qualitative interviews. {T}he objective is to analyse how the migrants themselves perceive "living apart together", the extent of this phenomenon, its timing, and the factors influencing it. {T}he longitudinal nature of our data specifically allows for the study of the drivers of couple reunification in {O}uagadougou and of the physical separation of partners, whereby one goes to live away from {O}uagadougou. {O}ur results reveal that 25% of migrants in a union had a partner living outside {O}uagadougou in 2015, and that the residential arrangements of such couples were associated with gender relations, family cycle, and integration into the city.}, keywords = {family reunification ; living apart together ; migration ; mixed methods ; residential arrangements ; urbanisation ; {O}uagadougou ; {BURKINA} {FASO} ; {OUAGADOUGOU}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{P}opulation {S}pace and {P}lace}, volume = {26}, numero = {4}, pages = {art. e2287 [16 ]}, ISSN = {1544-8444}, year = {2020}, DOI = {10.1002/psp.2287}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010077385}, } @incollection{fdi:010078707, title = {{L}'utilisation du terme "vuln{\'e}rabilit{\'e}" par l'{O}rganisation {I}nternationale pour les {M}igrations}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{FRE}}, abstract = {}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} ; {ORGANISATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {VULNERABILITE} ; {RECHERCHE} {PLURIDISCIPLINAIRE} ; {CONCEPT} ; {TRANSIT} ; {CHANGEMENT} {CLIMATIQUE} ; {GESTION} {DU} {RISQUE} ; {PAYS} {DU} {SUD}}, booktitle = {{L}a vuln{\'e}rabilit{\'e} {\`a} l'encontre des id{\'e}es re{\c{c}}ues}, numero = {6}, pages = {14--22}, address = {{M}arseille}, publisher = {{LPED}}, series = {{L}es {I}mpromptus du {LPED}}, year = {2020}, ISBN = {979-10-967630-8-5}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078707}, } @article{fdi:010081743, title = {{I}nternational migration : trends, determinants, and policy effects}, author = {{D}e {H}aas, {H}. and {C}zaika, {M}. and {F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {M}ahendra, {E}. and {N}atter, {K}. and {V}ezzoli, {S}. and {V}illares-{V}arela, {M}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}his paper synthesizes insights from new global data on the effectiveness of migration policies. {I}t investigates the complex links between migration policies and migration trends to disentangle policy effects from structural migration determinants. {T}he analysis challenges two central assumptions underpinning the popular idea that migration restrictions have failed to curb migration. {F}irst, post {WWII} global migration levels have not accelerated, but remained relatively stable while most shifts in migration patterns have been directional. {S}econd, post {WWII} migration policies have generally liberalized despite political rhetoric suggesting the contrary. {W}hile migration policies are generally effective, "substitution effects" can limit their effectiveness, or even make them counterproductive, by geographically diverting migration, interrupting circulation, encouraging unauthorized migration, or prompting "now or never" migration surges. {T}hese effects expose fundamental policy dilemmas and highlight the importance of understanding the economic, social, and political trends that shape migration in sometimes counterintuitive, but powerful, ways that largely lie beyond the reach of migration policies.}, keywords = {{MONDE}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{P}opulation and {D}evelopment {R}eview}, volume = {15}, numero = {4}, pages = {885--922}, ISSN = {0098-7921}, year = {2019}, DOI = {10.1111/padr.12291}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010081743}, } @article{fdi:010076887, title = {{D}ifficult{\'e}s {\'e}conomiques et transformation des unions {\`a} {K}inshasa}, author = {{N}appa, {J}. and {S}choumaker, {B}. and {P}hongi, {A}. and {F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{FRE}}, abstract = {{L}es d{\'e}bats sur les dynamiques des changements d{\'e}mographiques en {A}frique subsaharienne opposent deux grilles de lecture de la baisse de la f{\'e}condit{\'e} et du recul de la nuptialit{\'e} : la plus classique l'associe aux progr{\`e}s socio{\'e}conomiques, tandis que la grille alternative suppose que la d{\'e}t{\'e}rioration des conditions de vie n{\'e}cessite des ajustements contraints de la f{\'e}condit{\'e} et de la nuptialit{\'e}. {S}uivant cette seconde hypoth{\`e}se, les auteurs s'interrogent sur les changements des pratiques matrimoniales dans la ville de {K}inshasa ({RDC}) en proie {\`a} des probl{\`e}mes {\'e}conomiques majeurs depuis de nombreuses ann{\'e}es. {L}'analyse r{\'e}alis{\'e}e {\`a} l'{\'e}chelle individuelle {\`a} partir des donn{\'e}es biographiques de l'enqu{\^e}te {M}afe r{\'e}pond {\`a} la question du r{\^o}le de la pr{\'e}carisation {\'e}conomique sur le recul de l'intensit{\'e} et du calendrier du mariage.}, keywords = {{KINSHASA} ; {REPUBLIQUE} {DEMOCRATIQUE} {DU} {CONGO}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{P}opulation}, volume = {74}, numero = {3}, pages = {273--298}, ISSN = {0032-4663}, year = {2019}, DOI = {10.3917/popu.1903.0273}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010076887}, } @article{fdi:010073620, title = {{E}xamining the role of border closure and post-colonial ties in {C}aribbean migration}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {V}ezzoli, {S}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}his article analyses the role of border regimes and post-colonial ties in {C}aribbean migration between 1960 and 2010. {O}ver this period, 18 out of 25 countries in the {C}aribbean region have experienced the closure of borders by their former colonial state, while the remaining seven former colonies have retained open borders with their metropolitan state. {I}n view of the academic and policy debate about the effects of border restrictions, the {C}aribbean region allows the comparison of emigration volumes and migration destination selection from {C}aribbean countries with both closed and open borders. {M}oreover, because the {C}aribbean region was colonised by {B}ritain, {F}rance, the {N}etherlands and the {U}nited {S}tates, we examine whether post-colonial ties influence long-term {C}aribbean emigration, allowing migrants to overcome border regime restrictions. {T}he article finds that countries with closed borders with the former colonial state do not experience a decrease but rather a strong increase in long-term emigration. {I}n fact, emigration gradually regains strength after border closure as migration channels to new destinations develop. {T}hus, border closure seems to encourage a weakening of 'post-colonial' migration patterns through the diversification of emigration towards destinations other than the former colonial state and its former colonies. {C}onversely, the increase of emigration from countries with open borders has decelerated and generally remained concentrated towards countries within the free-movement colonial sphere. {T}his suggests that the post-colonial migration patterns may be associated with continuous open borders as much as with cultural and linguistic connections.}, keywords = {migration ; borders ; open borders ; post-colonial ties ; {C}aribbean ; {CARAIBE}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{M}igration {S}tudies}, volume = {6}, numero = {2}, pages = {165--186}, ISSN = {2049-5838}, year = {2018}, DOI = {10.1093/migration/mnx034}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010073620}, } @techreport{fdi:010078391, title = {{I}nternational migration : trends, determinants and policy effects}, author = {{D}e {H}aas, {H}. and {C}zaika, {M}. and {F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {M}ahendra, {E}. and {N}atter, {K}. and {V}ezzoli, {S}. and {V}illares‐{V}arela, {M}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{W}hat have been the main trends and drivers of international migration over the last century, and to what extent have migration policies been effective in shaping the volume, direction, timing, and selection of immigration and emigration? {T}his paper reviews the insights on migration trends, determinants and policy effects gained through the {DEMIG} ({D}eterminants of {I}nternational {M}igration) project. {Q}uestioning popular perceptions of accelerating international migration, the increase in global migration has remained proportional to the increase in world population. {T}he main migratory shifts in the second half of the twentieth century have been directional, particularly through the decline of {E}urope as an area of origin and the emergence of {E}urope and the {G}ulf as new global destinations. {T}his shift in migration movements towards {E}urope has been associated by an overall liberalisation of migration policies, which have increasingly focused on the selecting of migrants rather than controlling numbers per se. {M}ost rules around legal entry, stay and exit of migrants have been relaxed, but a combination of visa and border control policies have served to prevent the entry of asylum seekers and other "unwanted" migrants. {O}ur analysis shows that it would therefore be excessive to conclude that borders are "beyond control" (cf. {B}hagwati 2003), and that migration policies are generally effective. {Y}et several "substitution effects" limit or undermine the effectiveness of migration controls by (1) redirecting migration through other geographical routes and destinations (spatial substitution), (2) diverting migration through other legal and unauthorized channels (categorical substitution), (3) "now or never" migration surges in anticipation of restrictions (intertemporal substitution) and (4) discouraging return and interrupting circulation (reverse flow substitution). {T}hese expose fundamental policy dilemmas as well as the importance to look beyond migration policies. {O}ur results show the importance of accounting for the complex and often counterintuitive ways in which structural social, economic, and political factors affect migration in mostly indirect, but powerful ways that largely lie beyond the reach of migration policies.}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {HISTOIRE} ; {EVOLUTION} ; {RELATIONS} {NORD} {SUD} ; {CONFLIT} {POLITIQUE} ; {INEGALITE} {SOCIALE} ; {PAUVRETE} ; {MARCHE} {DU} {TRAVAIL} ; {ANALYSE} {STATISTIQUE} ; {ANALYSE} {DIACHRONIQUE} ; {POLITIQUE} {MIGRATOIRE} ; {DYNAMIQUE} {MIGRATOIRE} ; {MONDE}}, address = {{O}xford}, publisher = {{IMI}}, series = {{W}orking {P}aper {S}eries - {IMI}}, pages = {59 multigr.}, year = {2018}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078391}, } @article{fdi:010069952, title = {{H}ome, sweet home ? {T}he effect of return migration support mechanisms on reintegration}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{B}ased on 68 qualitative interviews carried out in {S}enegal and {DR} {C}ongo with beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries of programs assisting migrants after their return to their origin country, this article investigates how these programs affect the reintegration of those migrants. {I}t uses an original approach, combining a qualitative thematic analysis of the interviews with a quantitative assessment of the economic, psychosocial and physical dimensions of the reintegration experience. {T}he analyses show that institutional assistance provided after return does not have a positive influence on the return migrants’ reintegration. {T}he research brings new empirical evidence to policy makers, demonstrating that when migrants do not return voluntarily, when they have not prepared their return on their own, and particularly when the context in their origin country is not stable, the chances of successful reintegration are low, even if institutional assistance after return is provided.}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {STATUT} {SOCIOECONOMIQUE} ; {INTEGRATION} {SOCIALE} ; {POLITIQUE} {SOCIALE} ; {ENQUETE} ; {MIGRATION} {DE} {RETOUR} ; {SENEGAL} ; {REPUBLIQUE} {DEMOCRATIQUE} {DU} {CONGO}}, booktitle = {{L}es migrations de retour en {A}frique}, journal = {{E}space, {P}opulations, {S}oci{\'e}t{\'e}s}, numero = {1}, pages = {art. no 7118 [17 en ligne]}, ISSN = {0755-7809}, year = {2017}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010069952}, } @article{fdi:010070400, title = {{T}he role of migration policy changes in {E}urope for return migration to {S}enegal}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}his study questions the role of migration policy changes in {F}rance, {I}taly, and {S}pain for return migration to {S}enegal, by analyzing biographic data from the {M}igration between {A}frica and {E}urope ({MAFE}-{S}enegal) survey and the contextual data of the {D}eterminants of {I}nternational {M}igration ({DEMIG}) {VISA} and {DEMIG} {POLICY} databases that cover major changes in migration policies in these destination countries for the different categories of migrants. {E}vent history logistic regressions reveal that {S}enegalese migrants are less likely to return when the entry restrictions have become tighter. {T}his result suggests that the decision to return depends on the possibility of migrating again after the return, which is crucial for both theory and policy regarding {W}estern democracies' attempts to regulate migration.}, keywords = {{SENEGAL} ; {FRANCE} ; {ITALIE} ; {ESPAGNE}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{I}nternational {M}igration {R}eview}, volume = {51}, numero = {4}, pages = {868--892}, ISSN = {1747-7379}, year = {2017}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010070400}, } @article{fdi:010069476, title = {{H}ow do post-colonial ties and migration regimes shape travel visa requirements ? {T}he case of {C}aribbean nationals}, author = {{V}ezzoli, {S}. and {F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{T}ravel visa requirements are generally recognised as the result of a trade-off between preventing irregular migration, ensuring security and allowing potential economic benefits to countries. {T}he role of history has been overlooked. {T}his article focuses on the {C}aribbean, a region heavily influenced by colonialism, which experienced important changes in political status and migration policies over the twentieth century. {U}sing bilateral travel visa requirement data, we examine the importance of two travel visa determinants: post-colonial ties and the migration regimes established by the former colonial state after independence. {W}e show that post-colonial ties explain patterns of travel visa requirements for {F}rance, the {N}etherlands and the {US}, but less for {B}ritain and {B}ritish-sphere {C}aribbean countries, revealing the less uniform and changing role of post-colonial ties. {T}ravel visa requirements largely reinforce migration regimes types, so that {C}aribbean citizens from countries with a closed migration regime also experienced reduced travel opportunities. {T}his reveals a perception that when the former colonial state limits migration opportunities, it might lead to travel, and potential overstaying, in other destinations. {T}hese findings provide new evidence of the relevance of colonial history and migration policies with the former colonial state in shaping travel opportunities of citizens of former colonies.}, keywords = {{T}ravel visa determinants ; visa policies ; post-colonial ties ; migration ; regimes ; {C}aribbean ; {CARAIBE}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{J}ournal of {E}thnic and {M}igration {S}tudies}, volume = {43}, numero = {7}, pages = {1141--1163}, ISSN = {1369-183{X}}, year = {2017}, DOI = {10.1080/1369183x.2016.1228446}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010069476}, } @article{fdi:010069951, title = {{L}es migrations de retour en {A}frique [{E}ditorial]}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {E}ggerickx, {T}. and {S}choumaker, {B}.}, editor = {{E}ggerickx, {T}. and {S}choumaker, {B}.}, language = {{FRE}}, abstract = {}, keywords = {{ANTHROPOLOGIE} {SOCIALE} ; {MIGRATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {INTEGRATION} {SOCIALE} ; {MIGRATION} {DE} {RETOUR} ; {AFRIQUE} ; {EGYPTE} ; {KENYA} ; {NIGER} ; {SENEGAL} ; {TUNISIE} ; {REPUBLIQUE} {DEMOCRATIQUE} {DU} {CONGO}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{E}space, {P}opulations, {S}oci{\'e}t{\'e}s}, numero = {1}, pages = {7079 [5 en ligne]}, ISSN = {0755-7809}, year = {2017}, DOI = {10.4000/eps.7079}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010069951}, } @article{fdi:010070401, title = {{A}frican migration : trends, patterns, drivers}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence and {D}e {H}aas, {H}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{A}frica is often seen as a continent of mass migration and displacement caused by poverty, violent conflict and environmental stress. {Y}et such perceptions are based on stereotypes rather than theoretically informed empirical research. {D}rawing on the migration and visa databases from the {D}eterminants of {I}nternational {M}igration ({DEMIG} project) and the {G}lobal {B}ilateral {M}igration {D}atabase ({GBMD}), this paper explores the evolution and drivers of migration within, towards and from {A}frica in the post-colonial period. {C}ontradicting common ideas of {A}frica as a ‘continent on the move', the analysis shows that intra-{A}frican migration intensities have gone down. {T}his may be related to state formation and the related imposition of barriers towards free movement in the wake of decolonisation as well as the concomitant rise of nationalism and inter-state tensions. {W}hile {A}frican migration remains overwhelmingly intra-continental, since the late 1980s there has been an acceleration and spatial diversification (beyond colonial patterns) of emigration out of {A}frica to {E}urope, {N}orth {A}merica, the {G}ulf and {A}sia. {T}his diversification of {A}frican emigration seems partly driven by the introduction of visa and other immigration restrictions by {E}uropean states. {C}ontradicting conventional interpretations of {A}frican migration being essentially driven by poverty, violence and underdevelopment, increasing migration out of {A}frica seems rather to be driven by processes of development and social transformation which have increased {A}fricans' capabilities and aspirations to migrate, a trend which is likely to continue in the future.}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {EMIGRATION} ; {EVOLUTION} ; {SYSTEME} {DE} {REPRESENTATIONS} ; {CHANGEMENT} {SOCIAL} ; {DEVELOPPEMENT} {ECONOMIQUE} ; {PERIODE} {POSTCOLONIALE} ; {AFRIQUE} ; {EUROPE} ; {AMERIQUE} {DU} {NORD}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{C}omparative {M}igration {S}tudies}, volume = {4}, numero = {1}, pages = {[25 en ligne]}, ISSN = {2214-8590}, year = {2016}, DOI = {10.1186/s40878-015-0015-6}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010070401}, } @article{fdi:010070409, title = {{I}ntention et r{\'e}alisation de migration de retour au {S}{\'e}n{\'e}gal et en {R}{\'e}publique d{\'e}mocratique du {C}ongo}, author = {{F}lahaux, {M}arie-{L}aurence}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{A} partir des donn{\'e}es biographiques du projet {MAFE} collect{\'e}es {\`a} la fois aupr{\`e}s de migrants pendant leur s{\'e}jour en {E}urope et de migrants de retour dans leur pays d'origine, cet article analyse, d'une part, l'intention initiale de retour des {S}{\'e}n{\'e}galais et des {C}ongolais qui ont migr{\'e} en {E}urope et, d'autre part, la r{\'e}alisation de cette intention. {L}es r{\'e}sultats r{\'e}v{\`e}lent qu'au moment de leur arriv{\'e}e, les individus envisagent de retourner dans leur pays d'origine avec l'objectif d'acqu{\'e}rir des ressources qu'ils pourront valoriser dans leur pays apr{\`e}s leur retour. {C}ependant, si la situation dans le pays d'origine se d{\'e}grade fortement, comme c'est le cas en {R}{\'e}publique d{\'e}mocratique du {C}ongo {\`a} partir des ann{\'e}es 1990, les migrants pr{\'e}f{\`e}rent s'{\'e}tablir d{\'e}finitivement en {E}urope. {E}n outre, plus il est difficile de migrer en {E}urope et moins les migrants ont l'intention de rentrer. {E}nfin, la d{\'e}t{\'e}rioration du contexte politique et {\'e}conomique dans les pays d'origine et les politiques migratoires restrictives des pays d'accueil d{\'e}couragent le retour de migrants qui avaient l'intention de rentrer dans leur pays d'origine au moment de leur arriv{\'e}e en {E}urope.}, keywords = {{MIGRATION} {INTERNATIONALE} ; {STATUT} {SOCIOECONOMIQUE} ; {INTEGRATION} {SOCIALE} ; {POLITIQUE} {SOCIALE} ; {HISTOIRE} {DE} {VIE} ; {MIGRATION} {DE} {RETOUR} ; {SENEGAL} ; {REPUBLIQUE} {DEMOCRATIQUE} {DU} {CONGO}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{P}opulation}, volume = {70}, numero = {1}, pages = {103--133}, ISSN = {0032-4663}, year = {2015}, DOI = {10.3917/popu.1501.0103}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010070409}, }