<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Development, reproducibility, and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among the adult population in Reunion Island</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>/Verger, Eric</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Eymard-Duvernay, Sabrina</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Amiri, Sarah</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Nourly, N.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tarnus, M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Gauvreau-B&#xE9;ziat, J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Du Chaffaut, L.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Oseredczuk, M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>All&#xE8;s, B.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>M&#xE9;jean, C.</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>French overseas region</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>dietary habits</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>assessment</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>tool</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>food frequency</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>questionnaire</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>Background: To date, there is no specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) to assess dietary habits in any of the French overseas regions. Objectives: This study aimed to describe the development of a culture and context-specific semiquantitative FFQ for use among the adult population in Reunion Island, to assess its reproducibility and its relative validity compared with 24-h dietary recalls (DRs). Methods: The CARI (observatoire des Comportements Alimentaires a la ReunIon) FFQ was adapted from the NutriNet-Sante FFQ, with a revised list of 181 food and beverage items reflecting local dietary practices and nutritional concerns. To assess its reproducibility, the FFQ was administered twice, 4 wk apart, to a purposive sample of 108 adults in Reunion Island. During the same period, participants also completed a weekly DR to evaluate the FFQ's validity. Reproducibility and validity were assessed for 18 food groups, energy, and 38 nutrients using correlations, cross-classification, and weighted kappa. Results: Regarding reproducibility, we found a median rank correlation of 0.56 (nutrients) and 0.64 (food groups). Most participants were correctly classified with a median of 78% (nutrients) and 83% (food group), whereas gross misclassification was low (2.8% and 0.9%, respectively). We found a median weighted kappa of 0.44 (nutrients) and 0.47 (food groups). Regarding validity, we found a median crude rank correlation of 0.51 (nutrients) and 0.43 (food groups). Most participants were correctly classified with a median agreement of 71% for nutrients and of 68% for food groups, whereas gross misclassification was low (1.9% and 0.9%, respectively). We found a median weighted kappa of 0.32 (nutrients) and 0.27 (food groups). Conclusions: The CARI FFQ has a moderate to good level of validity for ranking food and nutrient intakes, and a good level of reproducibility, supporting its use for dietary assessment in Reunion Island.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>2025</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010095517</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010095517</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>Verger Eric, Eymard-Duvernay Sabrina, Amiri Sarah, Nourly N., Tarnus M., Gauvreau-B&#xE9;ziat J., Du Chaffaut L., Oseredczuk M., All&#xE8;s B., M&#xE9;jean C.. Development, reproducibility, and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire for use among the adult population in Reunion Island. 2025, 9 (11), 107571 [11 ]</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
  <dc:coverage>REUNION</dc:coverage>
</oai_dc:dc>
