<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>ECGTIzER : an open-source, fully automated pipeline for digitization and signal recovery from paper electrocardiograms</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Lence, A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Fall, Ahmad</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Cohen, S. D.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Granese, F.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Zucker, Jean-Daniel</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Salem, J. E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Prifti, Edi</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>Electrocardiograms</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Digitization</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Signal recovery</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Fully automated</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Torsades-de-pointes</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Artificial intelligence</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>Background and Objective: Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are essential for diagnosing cardiac pathologies, yet traditional paper-based ECG storage poses significant challenges for automated analyses. Despite the growing interest in leveraging AI for ECG analysis, there remains a lack of accessible, fully automated tools for digitizing paper-based ECGs. Existing solutions are often incomplete, behind paywalls, or not suited for large-scale use. To address this gap, we present ECGTIzER: an open-source, fully automated tool that enables high-fidelity digitization of paper ECGs, ensuring long-term preservation of clinical data and unlocking their potential for modern AI-driven analysis. Methods: ECGTIzER employs automated lead detection, three different pixel-based signal extraction algorithms, and a deep learning-based signal reconstruction module. We evaluated ECGTIzER on two datasets: a real-life cohort from the COVID-19 pandemic (JOCOVID) and a publicly available dataset (PTB-XL). Performance was compared with two existing methods: the fully automated ECGMINER and the semi-automated PAPERECG, which requires human intervention. The tools' digitization performance was assessed in terms of signal recovery, the fidelity of clinically relevant feature measurement and downstream AI classification tasks on a third dataset (GENEREPOL). Results: Results show that ECGTIzER outperforms state-of-the-art methods, with its ECGTIzERFrag algorithm delivering superior signal recovery performance. While PAPERECG demonstrated better outcomes than ECGMINER, it also requires human input. Conclusions: ECGTIzER enhances the usability of historical ECG data and supports advanced AI-based diagnostic methods, making it a valuable addition to the field of AI in ECG analysis.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>2026</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010095306</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010095306</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>Lence A., Fall Ahmad, Cohen S. D., Granese F., Zucker Jean-Daniel, Salem J. E., Prifti Edi. ECGTIzER : an open-source, fully automated pipeline for digitization and signal recovery from paper electrocardiograms. 2026, 112 (D),  108710 [12 p.]</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc>
