@article{fdi:010092553,
  title = {{M}olecular insights into species delimitations of {C}ryptocarya, {E}ndiandra, and {B}eilschmiedia ({L}auraceae) in {N}ew {C}aledonia and neighbouring islands},
  author = {{M}unzinger, {J}{\'e}r{\^o}me and {G}emmill, {C}.{E}.{C}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{I}n order to gain a better understanding of the delimitation and history of species of {L}auraceae present in {N}ew {C}aledonia, several of which are thought to be new, a phylogenetic analysis based on the {ITS} nuclear sequences of {C}ryptocaryeae was undertaken with 147 new samples from the region. {T}his study reveals monophyly for most of the currently recognised {N}ew {C}aledonian species in {C}ryptocarya and {E}ndiandra, and for seven recently published new species ({C}. adpressa, {C}. barrabeae, {C}. chrysea, {C}. conduplicata, {C}. ovoidea, {E}. humboldtiana, and {E}. trichogyna). {A}s well, several presumed new species in these two genera, based on morphological features, were found to be monophyletic and will require formal description. {T}he monophyly of {C}ryptocarya is again confirmed, and that of {E}ndiandra appears probable. {I}n {B}eilschmiedia, four genetically distinct {N}ew {C}aledonian clades were observed, but they do not correspond to the two described species ({B}. oreophila and {B}. neocaledonica) nor to one easily recognised morphospecies. {T}he relationships among the genera {B}eilschmiedia, {E}ndiandra, {S}yndiclis, {S}inopora, {P}otameia and {Y}asunia remain unresolved. {B}eilschmiedia from {N}ew {C}aledonia represents a distinct clade. {F}inally, this study reveals a dynamic history with multiple colonisation events onto the archipelago.},
  keywords = {{NOUVELLE} {CALEDONIE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{P}hytotaxa},
  volume = {681},
  numero = {3},
  pages = {233--264},
  ISSN = {1179-3163},
  year = {2025},
  DOI = {10.11646/phytotaxa.681.3.1},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010092553},
}