@article{fdi:010091923,
  title = {{C}o-benefits of and trade-offs between natural climate solutions and {S}ustainable {D}evelopment {G}oals},
  author = {{M}ariani, {G}ael and {M}oullec, {F}. and {A}twood, {T}. {B}. and {C}larkson, {B}. and {C}onant, {R}. {T}. and {C}ullen-{U}nsworth, {L}. and {G}riscom, {B}. and {G}utt, {J}. and {H}oward, {J}. and {K}rause-{J}ensen, {D}. and {L}eavitt, {S}. {M}. and {L}ee, {S}. {Y}. and {L}ivesley, {S}. {J}. and {M}acreadie, {P}. and {S}t-{J}ohn, {M}. and {Z}ganjar, {C}. and {C}heung, {W}. {W}. {L}. and {D}uarte, {C}. {M}. and {S}hin, {Y}unne-{J}ai and {S}ingh, {G}. {G}. and {L}oiseau, {N}. and {T}roussellier, {M}. and {M}ouillot, {D}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{C}ombating climate change and achieving the {UN} {S}ustainable {D}evelopment {G}oals ({SDG}s) are two important challenges facing humanity. {N}atural climate solutions ({NCS}s) can contribute to the achievement of these two commitments but can also generate conflicting trade-offs. {H}ere, we reviewed the literature and drew on expert knowledge to assess the co-benefits of and trade-offs between 150 {SDG} targets and {NCS}s within 12 selected ecosystems. {W}e demonstrate that terrestrial, coastal, and marine {NCS}s enable the attainment of different sets of {SDG} targets, with low redundancy. {I}mplementing {NCS}s in various ecosystems would therefore maximize achievement of {SDG} targets but would also induce trade-offs, particularly if best practices are not followed. {R}eliance on {NCS}s at large scales will require that these trade-offs be taken into consideration to ensure the simultaneous realization of positive climate outcomes and multiple {SDG} targets for diverse stakeholders.},
  keywords = {},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{F}rontiers in {E}cology and the {E}nvironment},
  volume = {22},
  numero = {10},
  pages = {e2807[10 ]},
  ISSN = {1540-9295},
  year = {2024},
  DOI = {10.1002/fee.2807},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010091923},
}