<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<modsCollection xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/mods/v3 http://www.loc.gov/standards/mods/v3/mods-3-3.xsd">
  <mods>
    <titleInfo>
      <title>Assessing the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa : a scoping review and a best fit framework synthesis</title>
    </titleInfo>
    <name type="personnal">
      <namePart type="family">Louart</namePart>
      <namePart type="given">S.</namePart>
      <role>
        <roleTerm type="text">auteur</roleTerm>
        <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">aut</roleTerm>
      </role>
      <affiliation>IRD</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="personnal">
      <namePart type="family">Hedible</namePart>
      <namePart type="given">G. B.</namePart>
      <role>
        <roleTerm type="text">auteur</roleTerm>
        <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">aut</roleTerm>
      </role>
      <affiliation>IRD</affiliation>
    </name>
    <name type="personnal">
      <namePart type="family">Ridde</namePart>
      <namePart type="given">Valéry</namePart>
      <role>
        <roleTerm type="text">auteur</roleTerm>
        <roleTerm type="code" authority="marcrelator">aut</roleTerm>
      </role>
      <affiliation>IRD</affiliation>
    </name>
    <typeOfResource>text</typeOfResource>
    <genre authority="local">journalArticle</genre>
    <language>
      <languageTerm type="code" authority="iso639-2b">eng</languageTerm>
    </language>
    <physicalDescription>
      <internetMediaType>text/pdf</internetMediaType>
      <digitalOrigin>reformatted digital</digitalOrigin>
      <reformattingQuality>access</reformattingQuality>
    </physicalDescription>
    <abstract>Acceptability is a key concept used to analyze the introduction of a health innovation in a specific setting. However, there seems to be a lack of clarity in this notion, both conceptually and practically. In low and middle-income countries, programs to support the diffusion of new technological tools are multiplying. They face challenges and difficulties that need to be understood with an in-depth analysis of the acceptability of these innovations. We performed a scoping review to explore the theories, methods and conceptual frameworks that have been used to measure and understand the acceptability of technological health innovations in sub-Saharan Africa. The review confirmed the lack of common definitions, conceptualizations and practical tools addressing the acceptability of health innovations. To synthesize and combine evidence, both theoretically and empirically, we then used the "best fit framework synthesis" method. Based on five conceptual and theoretical frameworks from scientific literature and evidence from 33 empirical studies, we built a conceptual framework in order to understand the acceptability of technological health innovations. This framework comprises 6 determinants (compatibility, social influence, personal emotions, perceived disadvantages, perceived advantages and perceived complexity) and two moderating factors (intervention and context). This knowledge synthesis work has also enabled us to propose a chronology of the different stages of acceptability.</abstract>
    <targetAudience authority="marctarget">specialized</targetAudience>
    <subject>
      <topic>Acceptability</topic>
      <topic>Innovation</topic>
      <topic>Health</topic>
      <topic>Scoping review</topic>
      <topic>Best fit framework synthesis</topic>
      <topic>Sub-Saharan Africa</topic>
    </subject>
    <subject authority="local">
      <geographic>AFRIQUE SUBSAHARIENNE</geographic>
    </subject>
    <classification authority="local">056</classification>
    <relatedItem type="host">
      <titleInfo>
        <title>BMC Health Services Research</title>
      </titleInfo>
      <part>
        <detail type="volume">
          <number>23</number>
        </detail>
        <detail type="volume">
          <number>1</number>
        </detail>
        <extent unit="pages">
          <list>930 [15 ]</list>
        </extent>
      </part>
      <originInfo>
        <dateIssued>2023</dateIssued>
      </originInfo>
    </relatedItem>
    <identifier type="uri">https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010090189</identifier>
    <identifier type="doi">10.1186/s12913-023-09897-4</identifier>
    <location>
      <shelfLocator>[F B010090189]</shelfLocator>
      <url usage="primary display" access="object in context">https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010090189</url>
      <url access="row object">https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/2023-10/010090189.pdf</url>
    </location>
    <recordInfo>
      <recordContentSource>IRD - Base Horizon / Pleins textes</recordContentSource>
      <recordCreationDate encoding="w3cdtf">2023-10-06</recordCreationDate>
      <recordChangeDate encoding="w3cdtf">2025-02-24</recordChangeDate>
      <recordIdentifier>fdi:010090189</recordIdentifier>
      <languageOfCataloging>
        <languageTerm authority="iso639-2b">fre</languageTerm>
      </languageOfCataloging>
    </recordInfo>
  </mods>
</modsCollection>
