<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <source-app name="Horizon">Horizon</source-app>
      <rec-number>1</rec-number>
      <foreign-keys>
        <key app="Horizon" db-id="fdi:010089016">1</key>
      </foreign-keys>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <work-type>ACL : Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture répertoriées par l'AERES</work-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>
            <style face="bold" font="default" size="100%">Bousmah, Marwan-al-Qays</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nishimwe, M.L.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tovar-Sanchez, T.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wandji, M.L.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mpoudi-Etame, M.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Maradan, G.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bassega, P.O.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Varloteaux, M.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Montoyo, A.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kouanfack, C.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Delaporte, E.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="bold" font="default" size="100%">Boyer, Sylvie</style>
          </author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>Cost-utility analysis of a Dolutegravir-based versus low-dose Efavirenz-based regimen for the initial treatment of HIV-infected patients in Cameroon (NAMSAL ANRS 12313 Trial)</title>
        <secondary-title>Pharmaceconomics</secondary-title>
      </titles>
      <pages>331-343</pages>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>CAMEROUN</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <dates>
        <year>2021</year>
      </dates>
      <call-num>fdi:010089016</call-num>
      <language>ENG</language>
      <periodical>
        <full-title>Pharmaceconomics</full-title>
      </periodical>
      <isbn>1170-7690</isbn>
      <accession-num>ISI:000601477200001</accession-num>
      <number>3</number>
      <electronic-resource-num>10.1007/s40273-020-00987-3</electronic-resource-num>
      <urls>
        <related-urls>
          <url>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010089016</url>
        </related-urls>
        <pdf-urls>
          <url>https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/2023-12/010089016.pdf</url>
        </pdf-urls>
      </urls>
      <volume>39</volume>
      <remote-database-provider>Horizon (IRD)</remote-database-provider>
      <abstract>Objectives Evidence comparing the economic and patient values of the World Health Organization's preferred (dolutegravir 50 mg [DTG]-based) and alternative (low-dose [400 mg] efavirenz [EFV400]-based) first-line antiretroviral regimens is limited. We compared patient-reported outcomes (PROs), costs, and the cost-utility of DTG- versus EFV400-based regimens in treatment-naive HIV-1 adults in the randomised NAMSAL ANRS 12313 trial in Yaounde, Cameroon. Methods We used clinical data, PROs, and health resource use data collected in the trial's first 96 weeks (2016-2019). Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were computed using utility scores obtained from the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) generic health scale. Other PROs included perceived symptoms, depression, anxiety, and stress. In the 96-week base-case analysis, we estimated the unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted (1) mean costs (in US$, 2016 values) and QALYs/patient, (2) incremental costs and QALYs/patient, and (3) net health benefit (NHB). Outcomes were extrapolated over 5 and 10 years. Uncertainty was assessed using the cost-effectiveness acceptability curve and scenario and cost-effective price threshold analyses. Results In the base-case analysis, the NHB (95% confidence interval) for the DTG-based regimen relative to the EFV400-based regimen was 0.056 (- 0.037 to 0.153), corresponding to an 88% probability of DTG being cost-effective. A 10% decrease in this regimen's price (from $5.2 to $4.7/month) would increase its cost-effectiveness probability to 95%. When extrapolating outcomes over 5 and 10 years, the DTG-based regimen had a 100% probability of being cost-effective for a large range of cost-effectiveness thresholds. Conclusions At 2020 antiretroviral drug prices, a DTG-based first-line regimen should be preferred over an EFV400-based regimen in sub-Saharan Africa.</abstract>
      <custom6>052MALTRA03 ; 050MEDECI ; 094COMIN</custom6>
      <custom1>UR259 / UR233</custom1>
      <custom7>Cameroun</custom7>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
