<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>COVAX - Time to reconsider the strategy and its target</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Bell, D.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Brown, G. W.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Oyibo, W. A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ouedraogo, S.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Tacheva, B.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Barbaud, E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Kalk, A.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Ridde, Val&#xE9;ry</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Paul, E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:description>COVAX, the international initiative supporting COVID-19 vaccination campaigns globally, is budgeted to be the costliest public health initiative in low- and middle-income countries, with over 16 billion US dollars already committed. While some claim that the target of vaccinating 70% of people worldwide is justified on equity grounds, we argue that this rationale is wrong for two reasons. First, mass COVID-19 vaccination campaigns do not meet standard public health requirements for clear expected benefit, based on costs, disease burden and intervention effectiveness. Second, it constitutes a diversion of resources from more cost-effective and impactful public health programmes, thus reducing health equity. We conclude that the COVAX initiative warrants urgent review.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>2023</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010088923</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010088923</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>Bell D., Brown G. W., Oyibo W. A., Ouedraogo S., Tacheva B., Barbaud E., Kalk A., Ridde Val&#xE9;ry, Paul E.. COVAX - Time to reconsider the strategy and its target. 2023, 4, 100096 [6 ]</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc>
