@article{fdi:010088803,
  title = {{F}rom geodiversity to geofunctionality : quantifying geodiversity-based ecosystem services for landscape planning in {F}rench {G}uiana},
  author = {{S}cammacca, {O}ttone and {B}{\'e}tard, {F}. and {M}ontagne, {D}. and {R}ivera, {L}. and {B}iancat, {C}. and {A}ertgeerts, {G}. and {H}euret, {A}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{G}eodiversity assessment gained a prominent interest in the geoscientific community and beyond. {H}owever, it is not always sufficient for land planning or geoconservation. {I}t is then pivotal to account for the contribution of functional geodiversity (i.e., geofunctionality), for instance declining the ecosystem services ({ES}) cascade model. {H}owever, by our knowledge, geodiversity-based {ES} ({GES}) have been rarely quantified. {T}his paper aims to adapt existing {ES}-related approaches to quantify and map {GES} in {F}rench {G}uiana, a {F}rench {O}verseas territory located in the {A}mazon, where ongoing land use changes might affect {ES} supply. {S}even {GES} were spatially assessed through an indicator-based approach accounting for both offered and used {GES} and merged into multiservice maps. {M}ultiservice maps were then combined with a hemeroby index to highlight geofunctionality hotspots. {D}ifference maps were finally used to compare geodiversity and geofunctionality patterns. {T}he {ES} framework seems an effective way to quantitatively assess geofunctionality. {G}eodiversity and geofunctionality do not follow the same spatial patterns: very geodiverse areas can be poorly functional and vice-versa. {T}herefore, geodiversity and geofunctionality need to be both considered when it comes to landscape planning. {T}his might be enhanced through hotspot mapping to highlight priority areas for planners. {T}his study also focuses on the role of human inputs in {GES} supply and raises questions about the selection of proper indicators that should fit each step from the {ES} supply to management. {H}igh-quality datasets must be available and their occasional absence is a central matter of land planning that must be addressed before every decision-making process.},
  keywords = {{G}eodiversity ; {E}cosystem services ; {H}otspots ; {L}andscape ; {H}uman inputs ; {F}rench {G}uiana ; {GUYANE} {FRANCAISE} ; {AMAZONIE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{G}eoheritage},
  volume = {16},
  numero = {1},
  pages = {3 [24 p.]},
  ISSN = {1867-2477},
  year = {2024},
  DOI = {10.1007/s12371-023-00910-0},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010088803},
}