Horizon 1 1 10 C-ACTI : Communications avec actes dans un congrès international The Effects of Noise on Aquatic Life 1 multigr. OCEAN INDIEN MER DE NORVEGE 2007 2007/08/13-17 fdi:010081984 ENG https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010081984 https://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/2021-07/010081984.pdf Horizon (IRD) Introduction : Acoustic monitoring is considered essential for the modern exploration and understanding of marine communities and ecosystems. Nevertheless, underwater noise pollution may have potentially negative effects, particularly on marine mammal and fish physiology and behaviour. This study aim to quantify how offshore whales and dolphins react on conventional fisheries acoustics from both a stationary and moving research vessel. Material and Methods : An acoustic monitoring methodology was applied with conventional fisheries acoustic instrumentation. A three-frequency echosounder (38, 70 and 120 kHz) and an omnidirectional multibeam sonar (24 kHz) were connected to artificial drifting Fish Aggregating Devices (FADs) during an international scientific cruise (February 2004) in the western Indian Ocean. A moving vessel equipped with multi-frequency echosounders (18, 38, 70, 120 and 200 kHz) andmultibeam (20-30, 110-120 kHz) sonars was also used during an ecosystem survey in the Norwegian Sea. Digital filming and ping-to-ping sonar tracking of animals were used to study marine mammal behaviour and possible reaction patterns to emitted sound from hydro-acoustic instrumentation. Results : When using conventional fisheries acoustics in the Indian Ocean, a group of sei whale approached a stationary vessel, providing some evidence that the acoustic signals did not cause a measurable avoidance response by the whales. Similarly, large whales (fin, humpback and sperm whales), and dolphins (pilot and killer whales) did not show measurable behavioural responses and avoidance reactions towards a moving vessel. Groups of whales and dolphins were actively feeding on herring, mackerel and krill for 10-40 minutes simultaneously as the vessel was within 50-800 meters distance at different speed (2-12 knots). Our results suggest that many marine mammals in open oceans do not actively avoid stationary or moving vessels applying fisheries acoustics. Further studies are needed to find operational hydro-acoustic thresholds (intensity, time and frequency), according to species and area specific hearing sensibility and reaction patterns, and to enlighten the physical/physiological impacts of human induced acoustic stimuli on marine mammals. We stress the importance of defining ?Underwater Noise Tolerance Thresholds?, as other anthropogenic sounds may strongly influence marine mammal behaviour and physiology. 040PECHE ; 036MILMAR