@article{fdi:010080476,
  title = {{B}enefits and gaps in area-based management tools for the ocean {S}ustainable {D}evelopment {G}oal},
  author = {{R}eimer, {J}. {M}. and {D}evillers, {R}odolphe and {C}laudet, {J}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{S}ustainable {D}evelopment {G}oal ({SDG}) 14 provides a vision for the world's oceans; however, the management interventions that are needed to achieve {SDG} 14 remain less clear. {W}e assessed the potential contributions of seven key area-based management tools (such as fisheries closures) to {SDG} 14 targets. {W}e conducted a rapid systematic review of 177 studies and an expert opinion survey to identify evidence of the ecological, social and economic outcomes from each type of tool. {W}e used these data to assess the level of confidence in the outcomes delivered by each tool and qualitatively scored how each tool contributes to each target. {W}e demonstrate that a combination of tools with diverse objectives and management approaches will be necessary to achieve all of the {SDG} 14 targets. {W}e highlight that some tools, including fully and partially protected areas and locally managed marine areas, may make stronger contributions to {SDG} 14 compared with other tools. {W}e identified gaps in the suitability of these tools to some targets, particularly targets related to pollution and acidification, as well as evidence gaps for social and economic outcomes. {O}ur findings provide operational guidance to support progress toward {SDG} 14. {A}n analysis of 177 studies and expert opinions about instruments for ocean protection shows that a combination of tools is needed to achieve all of the ocean {SDG} targets.},
  keywords = {{MONDE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{N}ature {S}ustainability},
  volume = {4},
  numero = {4},
  pages = {349--357},
  ISSN = {2398-9629},
  year = {2021},
  DOI = {10.1038/s41893-020-00659-2},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010080476},
}