@article{fdi:010079735,
  title = {{A}ssessing dietary diversity in pregnant women : relative validity of the list-based and open recall methods},
  author = {{N}guyen, {P}. {H}. and {M}artin-{P}r{\'e}vel, {Y}ves and {M}oursi, {M}. and {T}ran, {L}. {M}. and {M}enon, {P}. and {R}uel, {M}. {T}. and {A}rimond, {M}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{B}ackground: {T}he {M}inimum {D}ietary {D}iversity for {W}omen ({MMD}-{W}) was validated as a proxy of micronutrient adequacy for nonpregnant women, with proposed data collection being either a list-based or a qualitative open recall method. {F}ew studies have compared the performance of these 2 methods. {O}bjectives: {W}e compared performance in predicting micronutrient adequacy of food group indicators ({FGI}s) measured by the list-based and the quantitative open recall methods using varying quantity cut-offs. {W}e also examined the agreement between list-based and open recall {FGI}s. {M}ethods: {D}ata were collected in {B}angladesh (n = 600 pregnant women) and {I}ndia (n = 655). {T}he performance of different indicators to predict micronutrient adequacy was compared using receiver operating characteristic ({ROC}) analysis. {C}orrelations between list-based and open recall {FGI}s were calculated using {S}pearman's rank test; agreement was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient ({ICC}) and kappa statistics. {F}ood groups that were most often misreported by the list-based method were identified. {R}esults: {T}here were no statistically significant differences in {ROC} curves between list-based and open recall {FGI}s in either country. {I}n {B}angladesh, correlations between list-based and open recall {FGI}s varied between 0.6 and 0.8; {ICC} values were 0.43-0.75; kappa values were 0.51-0.53 when using a cut-off of any quantity or 15 g for open recall, but were lower (k = 0.24) with the cut-off of 1 portion. {I}n {I}ndia, these values were lower: similar to 0.4 for correlation, 0.32-0.37 for {ICC}s, and 0.17-0.22 for kappas. {F}ood groups most susceptible to misreporting using the list-based method were beans/peas in {B}angladesh and other vegetables in {I}ndia. {C}onclusions: {O}ur study provides initial support for the use of list-based questionnaires in assessing food group diversity or prevalence of {MDD}-{W} in pregnant women. {A}dditional and context-specific work may be required to understand the potential of simple methodologies to assess consumption of specific food groups.},
  keywords = {{B}angladesh ; {I}ndia ; list-based method ; open recall method ; {M}inimum ; {D}ietary {D}iversity for {W}omen ; {BANGLADESH} ; {INDE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{C}urrent {D}evelopments in {N}utrition},
  volume = {4},
  numero = {1},
  pages = {nzz134 [8]},
  ISSN = {2475-2991},
  year = {2020},
  DOI = {10.1093/cdn/nzz134},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079735},
}