@article{fdi:010079734,
  title = {{R}esidual marine protected areas five years on : are we still favouring ease of establishment over need for protection ?},
  author = {{D}evillers, {R}odolphe and {P}ressey, {R}. {L}. and {W}ard, {T}. {J}. and {G}rech, {A}. and {K}ittinger, {J}. {N}. and {E}dgar, {G}. {J}. and {W}atson, {R}. {A}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{M}arine protected areas ({MPA}s) are today's cornerstone of many marine conservation strategies. {O}ur 2015 study ({D}evillers et al., 2015) and others have shown, however, that the placement of {MPA}s is 'residual' to commercial uses and biased towards areas of lower economic value or interest. {I}n this paper, we explored the impact of our study on marine science, policy and management practice. {W}e reviewed the papers citing our work and compiled expert opinions on some of the impacts of our study. {R}esults indicate a strong general uptake in the scientific community but more uneven impacts on policy and management in different contexts, with a likely smaller impact of the research on conservation practice. 1.2.3.4.},
  keywords = {extractive uses ; marine protected area ; marine reserve ; ocean ; management ; research impact},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{A}quatic {C}onservation-{M}arine and {F}reshwater {E}cosystems},
  volume = {30},
  numero = {9},
  pages = {1758--1764},
  ISSN = {1052-7613},
  year = {2020},
  DOI = {10.1002/aqc.3374},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079734},
}