<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Freshwater fish diversity hotspots for conservation priorities in the Amazon Basin</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>/J&#xE9;z&#xE9;quel, C&#xE9;line</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Tedesco, Pablo</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Darwall, W.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Dias, M. S.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Frederico, R. G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Hidalgo, M.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Hugueny, Bernard</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Maldonado-Ocampo, J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Martens, K.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ortega, H.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Torrente-Vilara, G.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Zuanon, J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Oberdorff, Thierry</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>conservation scenarios</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>freshwater biodiversity</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>neotropics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>spatial</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>prioritization</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>Conserving freshwater habitats and their biodiversity in the Amazon Basin is a growing challenge in the face of rapid anthropogenic changes. We used the most comprehensive fish-occurrence database available (2355 valid species; 21,248 sampling points) and 3 ecological criteria (irreplaceability, representativeness, and vulnerability) to identify biodiversity hotspots based on 6 conservation templates (3 proactive, 1 reactive, 1 representative, and 1 balanced) to provide a set of alternative planning solutions for freshwater fish protection in the Amazon Basin. We identified empirically for each template the 17% of sub-basins that should be conserved and performed a prioritization analysis by identifying current and future (2050) threats (i.e., degree of deforestation and habitat fragmentation by dams). Two of our 3 proactive templates had around 65% of their surface covered by protected areas; high levels of irreplaceability (60% of endemics) and representativeness (71% of the Amazonian fish fauna); and low current and future vulnerability. These 2 templates, then, seemed more robust for conservation prioritization. The future of the selected sub-basins in these 2 proactive templates is not immediately threatened by human activities, and these sub-basins host the largest part of Amazonian biodiversity. They could easily be conserved if no additional threats occur between now and 2050.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079514</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010079514</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>J&#xE9;z&#xE9;quel C&#xE9;line, Tedesco Pablo, Darwall W., Dias M. S., Frederico R. G., Hidalgo M., Hugueny Bernard, Maldonado-Ocampo J., Martens K., Ortega H., Torrente-Vilara G., Zuanon J., Oberdorff Thierry. Freshwater fish diversity hotspots for conservation priorities in the Amazon Basin. 2020, 34 (4),  956-965</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
  <dc:coverage>AMAZONE BASSIN</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>BOLIVIE</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>BRESIL</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>COLOMBIE</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>EQUATEUR</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>GUYANA</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>GUYANE</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>PEROU</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>SURINAME</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>VENEZUELA</dc:coverage>
</oai_dc:dc>
