<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xml>
  <records>
    <record>
      <source-app name="Horizon">Horizon</source-app>
      <rec-number>1</rec-number>
      <foreign-keys>
        <key app="Horizon" db-id="fdi:010078897">1</key>
      </foreign-keys>
      <ref-type name="Journal Article">17</ref-type>
      <work-type>ACL : Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture répertoriées par l'AERES</work-type>
      <contributors>
        <authors>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nguyen, H. T.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Torbica, A.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Brenner, S.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Kiendrebeogo, J. A.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Tapsoba, L.</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="bold" font="default" size="100%">Ridde, Valéry</style>
          </author>
          <author>
            <style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">De Allegri, M.</style>
          </author>
        </authors>
      </contributors>
      <titles>
        <title>Economic evaluation of user-fee exemption policies for maternal healthcare in Burkina Faso : evidence from a cost-effectiveness analysis</title>
        <secondary-title>Value in Health</secondary-title>
      </titles>
      <pages>300-308</pages>
      <keywords>
        <keyword>Burkina Faso</keyword>
        <keyword>economic evaluation</keyword>
        <keyword>facility-based delivery</keyword>
        <keyword>maternal care</keyword>
        <keyword>user-fee exemptions</keyword>
        <keyword>BURKINA FASO</keyword>
      </keywords>
      <dates>
        <year>2020</year>
      </dates>
      <call-num>fdi:010078897</call-num>
      <language>ENG</language>
      <periodical>
        <full-title>Value in Health</full-title>
      </periodical>
      <isbn>1098-3015</isbn>
      <accession-num>ISI:000520858100006</accession-num>
      <number>3</number>
      <electronic-resource-num>10.1016/j.jval.2019.10.007</electronic-resource-num>
      <urls>
        <related-urls>
          <url>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078897</url>
        </related-urls>
        <pdf-urls>
          <url>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/intranet/publi/2020/04/010078897.pdf</url>
        </pdf-urls>
      </urls>
      <volume>23</volume>
      <remote-database-provider>Horizon (IRD)</remote-database-provider>
      <abstract>Objectives: The reduction and removal of user fees for essential care services have recently become a key instrument to advance universal health coverage in sub-Saharan Africa, but no evidence exists on its cost-effectiveness. We aimed to address this gap by estimating the cost-effectiveness of 2 user-fee exemption inte rventions in Burkina Faso between 2007 and 2015: the national 80% user-fee reduction policy for delivery care services and the user-fee removal pilot (ie, the complete [100%] user-fee removal for delivery care) in the Sahel region. Methods: We built a single decision tree to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the 2 study interventions and the baseline. The decision tree was populated with an own impact evaluation and the best available epidemiological evidence. Results: Relative to the baseline, both the national 80% user-fee reduction policy and the user-fee removal pilot are highly cost-effective, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $210.22 and $252.51 per disability-adjusted life-year averted, respectively. Relative to the national 80% user-fee reduction policy, the user-fee removal pilot entails an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $309.74 per disability-adjusted life-year averted. Conclusions: Our study suggests that it is worthwhile for Burkina Faso to move from an 80% reduction to the complete removal of user fees for delivery care. Local analyses should be done to identify whether it is worthwhile to implement user-fee exemptions in other sub-Saharan African countries.</abstract>
      <custom6>056</custom6>
      <custom1>UR196</custom1>
      <custom7>Burkina Faso</custom7>
    </record>
  </records>
</xml>
