<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Dealing with complexity and heterogeneity in a collaborative realist multiple case study in low- and middle-income countries</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Robert, E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Ridde, Val&#xE9;ry</dc:creator>
  <dc:description>A qualitative realist evaluation research was conducted in six African countries to understand a complex and multifaceted World Health Organization program that provides technical and financial support to Ministries of Health in low- and middle-income countries. This support aims to foster the institutionalization of policy dialogue  as  a  collaborative  governance  device,  the  purpose  of  which  is  the  advancement  of  universal health coverage. This case study illustrates the realist and collaborative approach used in this multi-country research. It highlights the methodological and pedagogical challenges we faced and for which we propose recommendations. We specifically present our collaborative approach with both our research collaborators and our World Health Organization colleagues, the step of co-construction of the intervention theory, and the  three  successive  stages  of  data  analysis.  This  case  is  for  readers  who  have  a  basic  understanding of the realist approach, case study, and evaluation. Readers who are not familiar with these methods are encouraged to first refer to the recommended readings.</dc:description>
  <dc:publisher>Sage</dc:publisher>
  <dc:date>2020</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078817</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010078817</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>Robert E., Ridde Val&#xE9;ry. Dealing with complexity and heterogeneity in a collaborative realist multiple case study in low- and middle-income countries. Sage, ). 2020, 16</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
  <dc:coverage>BURKINA FASO</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>TOGO</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>NIGER</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>CAP VERT</dc:coverage>
  <dc:coverage>LIBERIA</dc:coverage>
</oai_dc:dc>
