@article{fdi:010078044,
  title = {{E}nhancing preparedness for arbovirus infections with a {O}ne {H}ealth {A}pproach : the development and implementation of multisectoral risk assessment exercises},
  author = {{D}ente, {M}. {G}. and {R}iccardo, {F}. and {V}an {B}ortel, {W}. and {M}arrama, {L}. and {M}ollet, {T}. and {D}errough, {T}. and {S}udre, {B}. and {C}alistri, {P}. and {N}acca, {G}. and {R}anghiasci, {A}. and {E}scadafal, {C}. and {G}aayeb, {L}. and {G}uillot, {A}. and {J}imenez-{C}lavero, {M}. {A}. and {M}anuguerra, {J}. {C}. and {M}ikaty, {G}. and {P}icard, {M}arie and {F}ernandez-{P}inero, {J}. and {P}erez-{R}amirez, {E}. and {R}obert, {V}incent and {V}ictoir, {K}. and {D}eclich, {S}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{B}ackground. {O}ne {H}ealth is receiving attention for arbovirus infection prevention and control and for defining national "intersectoral" priorities. {I}ncreasing awareness of intersectoral priorities through multisectorial risk assessments ({MRA}) is promising, where data are not systematically shared between sectors. {T}owards this aim, the {M}edi{L}ab{S}ecure project organized three {MRA} exercises (hereby called exercises): one on {W}est {N}ile virus, one on {C}rimean-{C}ongo haemorrhagic fever, and one on {R}ift {V}alley fever, assessing the added value of this approach. {M}ethods. {T}he exercises relied on {RA} methodologies of international organisations. {C}ountry representatives of the human and animal virology, medical entomology, and public health sectors (hereby called "sectors") involved in the surveillance of vector-borne diseases participated in the exercises. {B}ackground documentation was provided before each exercise, and a guide was developed for the facilitators. {A}ll three exercises included technical and methodological presentations and a guided {RA} directed at bringing into play the different sectors involved. {T}o assess the added value of the approach, each participant was asked to rank the level of perceived benefit of the multisectoral collaboration for each "risk question" included in the exercises. {R}esults. {I}n total, 195 participants from 19 non-{EU} countries in the {M}editerranean and {B}lack {S}ea regions took part in the exercises. {T}he participants assessed the multisectoral approach as valuable in analysing comprehensively the situation by having access to information and knowledge provided by each of the sectors involved. {S}haring of information and discussion facilitated reaching a consensus on the level of risk in each country. {C}onclusions. {I}ncreasing awareness of intersectoral priorities, including cross-border ones, through {MRA} is relevant to reduce gaps due to unavailability of shared data and information. {G}iven that six out of the ten threats to global health listed by {WHO} are occurring at the human-animal-environmental interfaces, comprehensive regional {RA} with a {O}ne {H}ealth approach made by national authorities can be a relevant added value for the global health security.},
  keywords = {{ALBANIE} ; {ALGERIE} ; {ARMENIE} ; {BOSNIE} {HERZEGOVINE} ; {EGYPTE} ; {GEORGIE} ; {JORDANIE} ; {KOSOVO} ; {LIBAN} ; {LIBYE} ; {MOLDAVIE} ; {MONTENEGRO} ; {MAROC} ; {PALESTINE} ; {MACEDOINE} {DU} {NORD} ; {SERBIE} ; {TUNISIE} ; {TURQUIE} ; {UKRAINE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{B}iomed {R}esearch {I}nternational},
  volume = {2020},
  numero = {},
  pages = {art. 4832360 [10 p.]},
  ISSN = {2314-6133},
  year = {2020},
  DOI = {10.1155/2020/4832360},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078044},
}