@article{fdi:010077388,
  title = {{E}xcito-repellent activity of beta-caryophyllene oxide against {A}edes aegypti and {A}nopheles minimus},
  author = {{N}ararak, {J}. and {S}athantriphop, {S}. and {K}ongmee, {M}. and {M}ahiou-{L}eddet, {V}. and {O}llivier, {E}. and {M}anguin, {S}ylvie and {C}hareonviriyaphap, {T}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{C}ontact irritant and non-contact repellent activities of beta-caryophyllene oxide were evaluated against laboratory strains of female {A}edes aegypti ({USDA} strain), a major arbovirus vector and {A}nopheles minimus ({KU} strain), a major malaria parasite vector, compared with the synthetic repellent {DEET}, using an excito-repellency test system. beta-caryophyllene oxide and {DEET} were tested at concentrations of 0.1, 0.25, 0.5 and 1.0% (v/v). {A}nopheles minimus was found to be more sensitive to beta-caryophyllene oxide than that of {A}e. aegypti and exhibited high avoidance response rates (86-96% escape) at 0.5% and 1.0% concentrations in contact and non-contact trials compared with {A}e. aegypti (22-59% escape). {H}owever, at the same concentrations, {DEET} displayed lower irritancy and repellency capacities against these two mosquito species (range 0-54% escape) compared to beta-aryophyllene oxide. {T}he analysis of escape responses showed significant differences between mosquito species at all concentrations ({P} < 0.05) except for 0.1%. {F}or both species, there were significant differences in irritant and repellent responses between beta-caryophyllene oxide and {DEET} at higher concentrations (0.5 and 1.0%).},
  keywords = {{A}edes aegypti ; {A}nopheles minimus ; beta-{C}aryophyllene oxide ; {C}ontact irritancy ; {N}on-contact repellency},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{A}cta {T}ropica},
  volume = {197},
  numero = {},
  pages = {art. 105030 [8 p.]},
  ISSN = {0001-706{X}},
  year = {2019},
  DOI = {10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.05.021},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010077388},
}