@article{fdi:010072333,
  title = {{T}he {I}mportance of fishing grounds as perceived by local communities can be undervalued by measures of socioeconomic cost used in conservation planning},
  author = {{H}amel, {M}. {A}. and {P}ressey, {R}. {L}. and {E}vans, {L}. {S}. and {A}ndr{\'e}fou{\¨e}t, {S}erge},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{M}arine reserve placement must account for the importance of places for resource use to minimize negative socioeconomic impacts and improve compliance. {I}t is often assumed that placing marine reserves in locations that minimize lost fishing opportunities will reduce impacts on coastal communities, but the influence of the fishing data used on this outcome remains poorly understood. {I}n the {M}adang {L}agoon ({P}apua {N}ew {G}uinea), we compared three types of proxies for conservation costs to local fishing communities. {W}e developed two types of proxies of opportunity costs commonly used in marine conservation planning: current fishing activity with fisher surveys (n = 68) and proximity from shore. {W}e also developed proxies based on areas of importance for fishing as perceived by surveyed households (n = 52). {A}lthough all proxies led to different configurations of potential marine reserves, the three types of cost data reflect different aspects of importance for fishing and should be used as complementary measures.},
  keywords = {{C}oral {T}riangle ; small-scale fisheries ; socioeconomic costs ; systematic ; conservation planning ; {M}adang {L}agoon ; opportunity costs ; values ; {PAPOUASIE} {NOUVELLE} {GUINEE} ; {MADANG} {LAGON}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{C}onservation {L}etters},
  volume = {11},
  numero = {1},
  pages = {},
  ISSN = {1755-263{X}},
  year = {2018},
  DOI = {10.1111/conl.12352},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010072333},
}