%0 Journal Article
%9 ACL : Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture répertoriées par l'AERES
%A Satgé, F.
%A Denezine, M.
%A Pillco, R.
%A Timouk, Franck
%A Pinel, S.
%A Molina, J.
%A Garnier, J.
%A Seyler, Frédérique
%A Bonnet, Marie-Paule
%T Absolute and relative height-pixel accuracy of SRTM-GL1 over the South American Andean Plateau
%D 2016
%L fdi:010068331
%G ENG
%J ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
%@ 0924-2716
%K Digital elevation model ; SRTM ; Accuracy ; South America ; Andean Plateau
%K AMERIQUE DU SUD ; BOLIVIE ; PEROU ; CHILI ; ANDES
%K TITICACA LAC ; POOPO LAC ; DESAGUADERO COURS D'EAU ; UYUNI SALAR
%M ISI:000387518300011
%P 157-166
%R 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.09.003
%U https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010068331
%> https://www.documentation.ird.fr/intranet/publi/2016/12/010068331.pdf
%V 121
%W Horizon (IRD)
%X Previously available only over the Continental United States (CONUS), the 1 arc-second mesh size (spatial resolution) SRTM-GL1 (Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission - Global 1) product has been freely available worldwide since November 2014. With a relatively small mesh size, this digital elevation model (DEM) provides valuable topographic information over remote regions. SRTM-GL1 is assessed for the first time over the South American Andean Plateau in terms of both the absolute and relative vertical point-to-point accuracies at the regional scale and for different slope classes. For comparison, SRTM-v4 and GDEM-v2 Global DEM version 2 (GDEM-v2) generated by ASTER (Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer) are also considered. A total of approximately 160,000 ICESat/GLAS (Ice, Cloud and Land Elevation Satellite/Geoscience Laser Altimeter System) data are used as ground reference measurements. Relative error is often neglected in DEM assessments due to the lack of reference data. A new methodology is proposed to assess the relative accuracies of SRTM-GL1, SRTM-v4 and GDEM-v2 based on a comparison with ICESat/GLAS measurements. Slope values derived from DEMs and ICESat/GLAS measurements from approximately 265,000 ICESat/GLAS point pairs are compared using quantitative and categorical statistical analysis introducing a new index: the False Slope Ratio (FSR). Additionally, a reference hydrological network is derived from Google Earth and compared with river networks derived from the DEMs to assess each DEM's potential for hydrological applications over the region. In terms of the absolute vertical accuracy on a global scale, GDEM-v2 is the most accurate DEM, while SRTM-GL1 is more accurate than SRTM-v4. However, a simple bias correction makes SRTM-GL1 the most accurate DEM over the region in terms of vertical accuracy. The relative accuracy results generally did not corroborate the absolute vertical accuracy. GDEM-v2 presents the lowest statistical results based on the relative accuracy, while SRTM-GL1 is the most accurate. Vertical accuracy and relative accuracy are two independent components that must be jointly considered when assessing a DEM's potential. DEM accuracies increased with slope. In terms of hydrological potential, SRTM products are more accurate than GDEM-v2. However, the DEMs exhibit river extraction limitations over the region due to the low regional slope gradient.
%$ 064 ; 062 ; 126