<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Towards improved criteria for hydrological model calibration : theoretical analysis of distance- and weak form-based functions</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Guinot, V.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Cappelaere, Bernard</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Delenne, C.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Ruelland, D.</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>Model performance evaluation</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Calibration</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Objective function</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Mean squared error</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Conceptual hydrological model</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>Calibrating conceptual hydrological models is often done via the optimization of objective functions serving as a measure of model performance. Most of the objective functions used in the hydrological literature can be classified into distance- and weak form-based objective functions. Distance- and weak form-based objective functions can be seen respectively as generalizations of the square error and balance error. An analysis of the objective functions shows that: (i) the calibration problem is transformed from an optimization problem with distance-based objective functions into a root finding problem for weak form-based functions; (ii) weak form-based objective functions are essentially less prone to local extrema than distance-based functions; (iii) consequently, they allow simple gradient-based methods to be used; (iv) parameter redundancy can be assessed very simply by superimposing the contour lines or comparing the gradients of two objective functions of similar nature in the parameter space; and (v) simple guidelines can be defined for the selection of the calibration variables in a conceptual hydrological model. The theoretical results are illustrated by two simple test cases. Weak form-based approaches offer the potential for better-posed calibration problems, through the use of a number of independent criteria that matches the dimension of the identification problem. In contrast with distance-based objective functions, they do not have the inconvenience of solution non-uniqueness. Finally, the need for models with internal variables bearing a physical meaning is acknowledged.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>2011</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010053501</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010053501</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>Guinot V., Cappelaere Bernard, Delenne C., Ruelland D.. Towards improved criteria for hydrological model calibration : theoretical analysis of distance- and weak form-based functions. 2011, 401 (1-2),  1-13</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc>
