%0 Journal Article
%9 ACL : Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture répertoriées par l'AERES
%A Brunet, Didier
%A Bernoux, Martial
%A Barthes, Bernard
%T Comparison between predictions of G and N contents in tropical soils using a Vis-NIR spectrometer including a fibre-optic probe versus an NIR spectrometer including a sample transport module
%D 2008
%L fdi:010042712
%G ENG
%J Biosystems Engineering
%@ 1537-5110
%M ISI:000258015600015
%N 3
%P 448-452
%R 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2008.04.008
%U https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010042712
%> https://www.documentation.ird.fr/intranet/publi/2008/08/010042712.pdf
%V 100
%W Horizon (IRD)
%X Increasing attention is being paid to near-infrared reflectance (NIR) spectroscopy for the rapid and cost-effective determination of soil carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) contents. The objective of the present paper was to compare the performances of two spectrometers: one covered the visible and NIR ranges (Vis-NIR, 350-2500 nm) and included a fibre-optic probe and the other covered the NIR range only (1100-2500 nm) and included a sample transport module. The comparison was carried out on two sets of clayey (n = 97) and sandy (n = 72) soil samples from tropical Africa and America. On the whole, both technologies provided good calibrations (R-2>0.74) and predictions (R-2>0.62) of soil C and N contents. The most accurate calibrations were achieved with the NIR spectrometer (R-2>0.86), which also yielded the most accurate predictions for the sandy soils (R-2 = 0.90 and standard error of prediction < 15% of the mean). For the clayey soils, the best predictions of both spectrometers were similar (R-2 >= 0.68 and standard error of prediction <20% of the mean). Using first or second derivatives of spectra did not affect calibration but had an impact on validation.
%$ 068