<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>Cryopreservation of sugarcane somatic embryos</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Martinez-Montero, M. E.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Martinez, J.</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>/Engelmann, Florent</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>Somatic embryos</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Sugarcane</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Vitrification</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Encapsulation-vitrification</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Droplet-vitrification</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>in this paper, we compared three vitrification-based cryopreservation techniques, viz. vitrification, encapsulation-vitrification and droplet-vitrification for cryopreserving sugarcane somatic embryos. Viability of somatic embryos was evaluated by measuring electrolyte leakage and by regrowth on recovery medium. Droplet-vitrification was the most efficient technique. Optimal conditions included loading with a solution containing 1.5 M glycerol and 0.3 M sucrose for 30 min at 25 degrees C, treatment with the PVS2 solution for 20-40 min at 0 degrees C followed by rapid immersion in liquid nitrogen of clumps of somatic embryos placed in microdroplets of cryoprotectant solution. Under such conditions, viability of cryopreserved somatic embryos reached 55 %.</dc:description>
  <dc:date>2008</dc:date>
  <dc:type>text</dc:type>
  <dc:identifier>https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010042701</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>fdi:010042701</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>Martinez-Montero M. E., Martinez J., Engelmann Florent. Cryopreservation of sugarcane somatic embryos. 2008, 29 (3),  229-242</dc:identifier>
  <dc:language>EN</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc>
