@article{fdi:010086882,
  title = {{Q}uantitative methods used to evaluate impact of combination {HIV} prevention intervention : a methodological systematic review},
  author = {{R}avalihasy, {A}ndrainolo and {A}nte-{T}estard, {P}. {A}. and {K}ardas-{S}loma, {L}. and {Y}azdanpanah, {Y}. and {D}e {A}llegri, {M}. and {R}idde, {V}al{\'e}ry},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{C}ombination {HIV} prevention aims to provide the right mix of biomedical, behavioral and structural interventions, and is considered the best approach to curb the {HIV} pandemic. {T}he impact evaluation of combined {HIV} prevention intervention ({CHPI}) provides critical information for decision making. {W}e conducted a systematic review of the literature to map the designs and methods used in these studies. {W}e searched original articles indexed in {W}eb of {S}cience, {S}copus and {P}ub{M}ed. {F}ifty-eight studies assessing the impact of {CHPI} on {HIV} transmission were included. {M}ost of the studies took place in {A}sia or sub-{S}aharan {A}frica and were published from 2000 onward. {W}e identified 36 (62.1%) quasi-experimental studies (posttest, pretest-posttest and nonequivalent group designs) and 22 (37.9%) experimental studies (randomized designs). {T}he findings suggest that diverse methods are already rooted in {CHPI} impact evaluation practices as recommended but should be better reported. {CHPI} impact evaluation would benefit from more comprehensive approaches.},
  keywords = {{C}ombination {HIV} prevention intervention ; {I}mpact evaluation ; {D}ecision-making ; {E}vidence-based},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{A}ids and {B}ehavior},
  volume = {[{E}arly access]},
  numero = {},
  pages = {[11 ]},
  ISSN = {1090-7165},
  year = {2023},
  DOI = {10.1007/s10461-023-04000-8},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010086882},
}