@article{fdi:010079987,
  title = {{L}inking humans, their animals, and the environment again : a decolonized and more-than-human approach to "{O}ne {H}ealth"},
  author = {{L}ain{\'e}, {N}icolas and {M}orand, {S}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{T}his article considers a broad perspective of "{O}ne {H}ealth" that includes local and animal knowledge. {D}rawing from various colonial efforts to link human, animal, and environmental health, it first shows that the current "{O}ne {H}ealth" initiative has its roots in colonial engagement and coincides with a need to secure the health of administrators (controlling that of local populations), while pursing use of resources. {I}n our contemporary period of repeated epidemic outbreaks, we then discuss the need for greater inclusion of social science knowledge for a better understanding of complex socio-ecological systems. {W}e show how considering anthropology and allied sub-disciplines (anthropology of nature, medical anthropology, and human-animal studies) highlights local knowledge on biodiversity as well as the way social scientists investigate diversity in relation to other forms of knowledge. {A}cknowledging recent approaches, specifically multispecies ethnography, the article then aims to include not only local knowledge but also non-human knowledge for a better prevention of epidemic outbreaks. {F}inally, the conclusion stresses the need to adopt the same symmetrical approach to scientific and profane knowledge as a way to decolonize {O}ne {H}ealth, as well as to engage in a more-than-human approach including non-human animals as objects-subjects of research.  {C}et article envisage une perspective elargie de << {O}ne {H}ealth >> (<< une seule sante >>) qui inclut les connaissances locales et celles des animaux. {S}'inspirant de divers efforts coloniaux pour relier la sante humaine, animale et environnementale, il montre d'abord que l'initiative << {O}ne {H}ealth >> prend ses racines durant la periode coloniale et coincide avec la necessite de garantir la sante des administrateurs (controlant celle des populations locales) tout en poursuivant l'exploitation des ressources. {D}ans notre periode contemporaine d'epidemies a repetition, il aborde ensuite la necessite d'une plus grande inclusion des travaux des chercheurs en sciences sociales pour une meilleure comprehension des systemes socio-ecologiques complexes. {L}'article montre comment la mobilisation de l'anthropologie et des sous-disciplines connexes (anthropologie de la nature, anthropologie medicale et etudes homme-animal), met en evidence les connaissances locales sur la biodiversite ainsi que la facon dont les chercheurs en sciences sociales l'etudient en relation avec d'autres formes de connaissances. {P}renant en compte les approches recentes developpees dans le domaine, notamment l'ethnographie multi-especes, il vise alors a inclure non seulement les connaissances profanes mais aussi les connaissances non-humaines pour une meilleure prevention des epidemies. {L}a conclusion souligne la necessite de mettre sur une meme ligne symetrique les connaissances scientifiques et profanes comme moyen de decoloniser {O}ne {H}ealth, ainsi que de s'engager dans une approche desanthropocentree en incluant les animaux non humains comme objet-sujet de recherche.},
  keywords = {{O}ne {H}ealth ; ({M}ultispecies) {E}thnography ; {K}nowledge ; {D}ecolonization ; {G}lobal health},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{P}arasite},
  volume = {27},
  numero = {},
  pages = {55 [10 p.]},
  ISSN = {1252-607{X}},
  year = {2020},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079987},
}