@article{fdi:010079958,
  title = {{R}emote sensing of environmental drivers influencing the movement ecology of sympatric wild and domestic ungulates in semi-arid savannas, a review},
  author = {{R}umiano, {F}. and {W}ielgus, {E}. and {M}iguel, {E}ve and {C}hamaille-{J}ammes, {S}. and {V}alls-{F}ox, {H}. and {C}ornelis, {D}. and {D}e {G}arine-{W}ichatitsky, {M}. and {F}ritz, {H}. and {C}aron, {A}. and {T}ran, {A}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{I}nterfaces between protected areas and their peripheries in southern {A}frica are subject to interactions between wildlife and livestock that vary in frequency and intensity. {I}n these areas, the juxtaposition between production and conservation land uses in a context of increasing anthropisation can create issues associated with human-wildlife coexistence and raises concerns for biodiversity conservation, local development and livelihoods. {T}his literature review aimed at addressing the need to consolidate and gather in one article current knowledge on potential uses of satellite remote sensing ({SRS}) products by movement ecologists to investigate the sympatry of wildlife/domestic ungulates in savanna interface environments. {A} keyword querying process of peer reviewed scientific paper, thesis and books has been implemented to identify references that (1) characterize the main environmental drivers impacting buffalo ({S}yncerus caffer caffer) and cattle ({B}os taurus & {B}os indicus) movements in southern {A}frica environments, (2) describe the {SRS} contribution to discriminate and characterize these drivers. {I}n total, 327 references have been selected and analyzed. {S}urface water, precipitation, landcover and fire emerged as key drivers impacting the buffalo and cattle movements. {T}hese environmental drivers can be efficiently characterized by {SRS}, mainly through open-access {SRS} products and standard image processing methods. {A}pplying {SRS} to better understand buffalo and cattle movements in semi-arid environments provides an operational framework that could be replicated in other type of interface where different wild and domestic species interact. {T}here is, however, a need for animal movement ecologists to reinforce their knowledge of remote sensing and/or to increase pluridisciplinary collaborations.},
  keywords = {{A}frican savanna ; animal movements ; earth observation imagery ; remote sensing ; sympatric wild and domestic ungulates ; wildlife-livestock ; interface ; {AFRIQUE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{R}emote {S}ensing},
  volume = {12},
  numero = {19},
  pages = {3218 [37 ]},
  year = {2020},
  DOI = {10.3390/rs12193218},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010079958},
}