@article{fdi:010078223, title = {{M}arine spatial planning provides a comprehensive framework for building evidence-based shark risk management policies with sea-users}, author = {{S}habtay, {A}. and {L}agabrielle, {E}rwann and {P}lot, {V}. and {P}otin, {G}. and {G}uyomard, {D}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{M}arine spatial planning ({MSP}), a process aimed at negotiating the spatial allocation of human activities at sea, has to integrate new challenges arising from growing human activities and their impacts on threatened marine ecosystems. {Y}et, human-wildlife interactions that result in threat to humans are rarely explicitly addressed in planning and almost not at all in {MSP}. {R}are events of unprovoked shark bites can significantly impact local economies while leading to polarized social debates that often hinder the development of evidence-based shark risk public policy. {H}ere, we suggest an approach for integrating shark risk and its management into {MSP}. {T}he method addresses simultaneously the spatial, social, and ecological components of shark risk and its inherent uncertainties. {T}he approach is applied on {R}eunion {I}sland case study where shark risk management is implemented as a response to a rapid increase in the frequency of shark bite events over the past decade. {S}imilar to other countries where shark risk management is implemented, sharks' removal is in the heart of social debate in {R}eunion {I}slands (3860 shark fishing operations in 5 years) and data gaps provide a fertile ground for alternative discourses and social conflicts about shark risk. {T}hrough a structured public consultation involving 200 stakeholders we demonstrate how {MSP} can be used to address shark risk while considering multiple sea-uses and conservation objectives. {T}he results suggest that the approach is ideal, both for integrating shark risk as a driver to the {MSP} process, and for developing a transparent, sustainable and evidence-based shark risk public policy as it places shark risk management within a broader social-ecological spectrum of stakes.}, keywords = {{M}arine spatial planning ; {S}hark risk management ; {H}uman-wildlife interactions ; {REUNION}}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{E}nvironmental {S}cience and {P}olicy}, volume = {111}, numero = {}, pages = {18--26}, ISSN = {1462-9011}, year = {2020}, DOI = {10.1016/j.envsci.2020.05.014}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010078223}, }