@article{fdi:010073976,
  title = {{I}mpact, economic evaluation, and sustainability of integrated vector management in urban settings to prevent vector-borne diseases : a scoping review},
  author = {{M}arcos-{M}arcos, {J}. and de {L}abry-{L}ima, {A}. {O}. and {T}oro-{C}ardenas, {S}. and {L}acasana, {M}. and {D}egroote, {S}. and {R}idde, {V}al{\'e}ry and {B}ermudez-{T}amayo, {C}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{B}ackground: {T}he control of vector-borne diseases ({VBD}) is one of the greatest challenges on the global health agenda. {R}apid and uncontrolled urbanization has heightened the interest in addressing these challenges through an integrated vector management ({IVM}) approach. {T}he aim was to identify components related to impacts, economic evaluation, and sustainability that might contribute to this integrated approach to {VBD} prevention. {M}ain body: {W}e conducted a scoping review of available literature (2000-2016) using {P}ub{M}ed, {W}eb of {S}cience, {C}ochrane, {CINAHL}, {E}conlit, {LILACS}, {G}lobal {H}ealth {D}atabase, {S}copus, and {E}mbase, as well as {T}ropical {D}iseases {B}ulletin, {WHOLIS}, {WHO} {P}esticide {E}valuation {S}cheme, and {G}oogle {S}cholar. {M}e{SH} terms and free-text terms were used. {A} data extraction form was used, including {TID}ie{R} and {ASTAIRE}. {MMAT} and {CHEERS} were used to evaluate quality. {O}f the 42 documents reviewed, 30 were focused on dengue, eight on malaria, and two on leishmaniasis. {M}ore than a half of the studies were conducted in the {A}mericas. {H}alf used a quantitative descriptive approach (n=21), followed by cluster randomized controlled trials (n=11). {R}egarding impacts, outcomes were: a) use of measures for vector control; b) vector control; c) health measures; and d) social measures. {IVM} reduced breeding sites, the entomology index, and parasite rates. {R}esults were heterogeneous, with variable magnitudes, but in all cases were favourable to the intervention. {E}vidence of {IVM} impacts on health outcomes was very limited but showed reduced incidence. {S}ocial outcomes were improved abilities and capacities, empowerment, and community knowledge. {R}egarding economic evaluation, only four studies performed an economic analysis, and intervention benefits outweighed costs. {C}ost-effectiveness was dependent on illness incidence. {T}he results provided key elements to analyze sustainability in terms of three dimensions (social, economic, and environmental), emphasizing the implementation of a community-focused eco-bio-social approach. {C}onclusions: {IVM} has an impact on reducing vector breeding sites and the entomology index, but evidence of impacts on health outcomes is limited. {S}ocial outcomes are improved abilities and capacities, empowerment, and community knowledge. {E}conomic evaluations are scarce, and cost-effectiveness is dependent on illness incidence. {C}ommunity capacity building is the main component of sustainability, together with collaboration, institutionalization, and routinization of activities. {F}indings indicate a great heterogeneity in the interventions and highlight the need for characterizing interventions rigorously to facilitate transferability.},
  keywords = {{V}ector-borne diseases ; {I}ntegrated vector management ; {U}rban health ; {I}ntervention ; {S}coping review},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{I}nfectious {D}iseases of {P}overty},
  volume = {7},
  numero = {},
  pages = {art. 83 [14 ]},
  ISSN = {2095-5162},
  year = {2018},
  DOI = {10.1186/s40249-018-0464-x},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010073976},
}