@article{fdi:010072291, title = {{A}ssessment of clinical decision-making among healthcare professionals performing caesarean deliveries in {B}urkina {F}aso}, author = {{K}abor{\'e}, {C}. and {R}idde, {V}al{\'e}ry and {K}ouanda, {S}. and {D}umont, {A}lexandre}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{O}bjective : {T}o identify the factors associated with quality decision-making of healthcare professionals in managing complicated labour and delivery in referral hospitals of {B}urkina {F}aso. {M}ethods : {W}e carried out a six-month observational cross-sectional study among 123 healthcare professionals performing caesareans in 22 hospitals. {C}linical decision-making was evaluated using hypothetical patient vignettes framed around four main complications during labour and delivery and developed using guidelines validated by an expert committee. {T}he results were used to generate a quality decision-making score. {A} multivariate linear regression analysis was used to identify the factors independently associated with the score. {R}esults : {O}ut of 100, the mean +/-?{SD} quality decision-making score was 63.84 +/- ?7.21 for midwives, 65.58? +/-? 6.90 for general practitioners ({GP}s), and 71.94 ?+/- ?6.70 for gynaecologist-obstetricians (p?