Horizon / Plein textes La base de ressources documentaires de l'IRD

IRD

Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Sikor T., He J., Lestrelin Guillaume. (2017). Property rights regimes and natural resources : a conceptual analysis revisited. World Development, 93, 337-349. ISSN 0305-750X

Fichier PDF disponible http://horizon.documentation.ird.fr/exl-doc/pleins_textes/divers17-04/010069464.pdf

Lien direct chez l'éditeur doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032

Titre
Property rights regimes and natural resources : a conceptual analysis revisited
Année de publication2017
Type de documentArticle référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000396973800022
AuteursSikor T., He J., Lestrelin Guillaume.
SourceWorld Development, 2017, 93, p. 337-349. ISSN 0305-750X
RésuméMore than two decades ago, Schlager and Ostrom (1992) developed 'a conceptual schema for arraying property-rights regimes that distinguishes among diverse bundles of rights'. The conceptual framework has profoundly influenced research on natural resource governance, common property, and community resource management. However, currently natural resource governance has changed dramatically, challenging the applicability of the conceptual schema. There are now many more social actors involved in resource management than the local communities at the focus of original analysis. Additionally, resource management increasingly provides access to various kinds of benefits from outside the immediate context, including indirect benefits such as payments for environmental services and results-based payments for REDD+. These changes demand addition of new property rights to the original framework. This paper updates the conceptual schema in reaction to changes in natural resource governance, proposing three specific modifications on the focus of use rights, control rights and authoritative rights to come up with a framework that distinguishes eight types of property rights. We apply the framework to three purposefully selected governance interventions in China and Laos that include the provision of indirect benefits in addition to the direct benefits derived by local people from natural resources. The empirical application shows how contemporary governance changes may not lead to local people's outright dispossession, since they continue to possess direct use rights to natural resources. However, local people may be excluded from control and authoritative rights, which are exercised exclusively by state agencies and international actors. The latter make available indirect benefits to local people, which may or may not translate into use rights in the sense of policy-based entitlements. The empirical insights suggest the possibility of a wider trend of 'com-pensated exclusions' in natural resource governance.
Plan de classementEconomie et sociologie rurale [098] ; Etudes, transformation, conservation du milieu naturel [082]
Descr. géo.LAOS ; CHINE
LocalisationFonds IRD [F B010069464]
Identifiant IRDfdi:010069464
Lien permanenthttp://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010069464

Export des données

Disponibilité des documents

Télechargment fichier PDF téléchargeable

Lien sur le Web lien chez l'éditeur

Accès réservé en accès réservé

HAL en libre accès sur HAL


Accès aux documents originaux :

Le FDI est labellisé CollEx

Accès direct

Bureau du chercheur

Site de la documentation

Espace intranet IST (accès réservé)

Suivi des publications IRD (accès réservé)

Mentions légales

Services Horizon

Poser une question

Consulter l'aide en ligne

Déposer une publication (accès réservé)

S'abonner au flux RSS

Voir les tableaux chronologiques et thématiques

Centres de documentation

Bondy

Montpellier (centre IRD)

Montpellier (MSE)

Nouméa

Papeete

Niamey

Ouagadougou

Tunis

La Paz

Quito