@article{fdi:010068870,
  title = {{P}ractical guidelines for studies on sandfly-borne phleboviruses : {P}art {II}. {I}mportant points to consider for fieldwork and subsequent virological screening},
  author = {{H}uemer, {H}. and {P}rudhomme, {J}orian and {A}maro, {F}. and {B}aklouti, {A}. and {W}alder, {G}. and {A}lten, {B}. and {M}outailler, {S}. and {E}rgunay, {K}. and {C}harrel, {R}. {N}. and {A}yhan, {N}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{I}n this series of review articles entitled "{P}ractical guidelines for studies on sandfly-borne phleboviruses,' the important points to be considered at the prefieldwork stage were addressed in part {I}, including parameters to be taken into account to define the geographic area for sand fly trapping and how to organize field collections. {H}ere in part {II}, the following points have been addressed: (1) factors influencing the efficacy of trapping and the different types of traps with their respective advantages and drawbacks, (2) how to process the trapped sand flies in the field, and (3) how to process the sand flies in the virology laboratory. {T}hese chapters provide the necessary information for adopting the most appropriate procedures depending on the requirements of the study. {I}n addition, practical information gathered through years of experience of translational projects is included to help newcomers to fieldwork studies.},
  keywords = {arbovirus ; {B}unyaviridae ; {P}hlebotomus ; phlebovirus ; {T}oscana virus},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{V}ector-{B}orne and {Z}oonotic {D}iseases},
  volume = {17},
  numero = {1},
  pages = {81--90},
  ISSN = {1530-3667},
  year = {2017},
  DOI = {10.1089/vbz.2016.1965},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010068870},
}