@article{fdi:010067731,
  title = {{P}redicting bee community responses to land-use changes : effects of geographic and taxonomic biases},
  author = {{D}e {P}alma, {A}. and {A}brahamczyk, {S}. and {A}izen, {M}. {A}. and {A}lbrecht, {M}. and {B}asset, {Y}. and {B}ates, {A}. and {B}lake, {R}. {J}. and {B}outin, {C}. and {B}ugter, {R}. and {C}onnop, {S}. and {C}ruz-{L}opez, {L}. and {C}unningham, {S}. {A}. and {D}arvill, {B}. and {D}iekotter, {T}. and {D}orn, {S}. and {D}owning, {N}. and {E}ntling, {M}. {H}. and {F}arwig, {N}. and {F}elicioli, {A}. and {F}onte, {S}. {J}. and {F}owler, {R}. and {F}ranzen, {M}. and {G}oulson, {D}. and {G}rass, {I}. and {H}anley, {M}. {E}. and {H}endrix, {S}. {D}. and {H}errmann, {F}. and {H}erzog, {F}. and {H}olzschuh, {A}. and {J}auker, {B}. and {K}essler, {M}. and {K}night, {M}. {E}. and {K}ruess, {A}. and {L}avelle, {P}atrick and {L}e {F}eon, {V}. and {L}entini, {P}. and {M}alone, {L}. {A}. and {M}arshall, {J}. and {P}achon, {E}. {M}. and {M}c{F}rederick, {Q}. {S}. and {M}orales, {C}. {L}. and {M}udri-{S}tojnic, {S}. and {N}ates-{P}arra, {G}. and {N}ilsson, {S}. {G}. and {O}ckinger, {E}. and {O}sgathorpe, {L}. and {P}arra, {A}. and {P}eres, {C}. {A}. and {P}ersson, {A}. {S}. and {P}etanidou, {T}. and {P}oveda, {K}. and {P}ower, {E}. {F}. and {Q}uaranta, {M}. and {Q}uintero, {C}. and {R}ader, {R}. and {R}ichards, {M}. {H}. and {R}oulston, {T}. and {R}ousseau, {L}. and {S}adler, {J}. {P}. and {S}amnegard, {U}. and {S}chellhorn, {N}. {A}. and {S}chuepp, {C}. and {S}chweiger, {O}. and {S}mith-{P}ardo, {A}. {H}. and {S}teffan-{D}ewenter, {I}. and {S}tout, {J}. {C}. and {T}onietto, {R}. {K}. and {T}scharntke, {T}. and {T}ylianakis, {J}. {M}. and {V}erboven, {H}. {A}. {F}. and {V}ergara, {C}. {H}. and {V}erhulst, {J}. and {W}estphal, {C}. and {Y}oon, {H}. {J}. and {P}urvis, {A}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{L}and-use change and intensification threaten bee populations worldwide, imperilling pollination services. {G}lobal models are needed to better characterise, project, and mitigate bees' responses to these human impacts. {T}he available data are, however, geographically and taxonomically unrepresentative; most data are from {N}orth {A}merica and {W}estern {E}urope, overrepresenting bumblebees and raising concerns that model results may not be generalizable to other regions and taxa. {T}o assess whether the geographic and taxonomic biases of data could undermine effectiveness of models for conservation policy, we have collated from the published literature a global dataset of bee diversity at sites facing land-use change and intensification, and assess whether bee responses to these pressures vary across 11 regions ({W}estern, {N}orthern, {E}astern and {S}outhern {E}urope; {N}orth, {C}entral and {S}outh {A}merica; {A}ustralia and {N}ew {Z}ealand; {S}outh {E}ast {A}sia; {M}iddle and {S}outhern {A}frica) and between bumblebees and other bees. {O}ur analyses highlight strong regionally-based responses of total abundance, species richness and {S}impson's diversity to land use, caused by variation in the sensitivity of species and potentially in the nature of threats. {T}hese results suggest that global extrapolation of models based on geographically and taxonomically restricted data may underestimate the true uncertainty, increasing the risk of ecological surprises.},
  keywords = {{MONDE}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{S}cientific {R}eports - {N}ature},
  volume = {6},
  numero = {},
  pages = {31153 [14 ]},
  ISSN = {2045-2322},
  year = {2016},
  DOI = {10.1038/srep31153},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010067731},
}