@article{fdi:010067327,
  title = {({E}thno-)medical ethics in globalizing {C}hina : tracing local knowledge and adaptation of biomedicine [chapitre 5]},
  author = {{M}icollier, {E}velyne},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{E}ncounters between several bodies of therapeutic knowledge have led to a restructuring of the entire health system, including a transformation in medical ethics. {D}efining "new ethics" with both {C}hinese and international characteristics, is part of the ongoing knowledge production process: plural health ideas, practices and medical sciences develop within the broader framework of social and economic transition. {S}uch transition simultaneously reveals and encourages {C}hina's influence and position in an era of globalization including in the technical and knowledge production domains. {R}e-alignments in medical ethics in {R}eform {C}hina (post-1979) highlight a rather under-explored aspect of medical plurality enabling these ethics to be used as an analytical lens to provide information about social and political issues. {I}n this article, two sets of ethical principles, one from {L}ate {I}mperial {C}hina ({L}ate {M}ing {E}ra), the other from post-{M}ao {C}hina (1980s), are detailed and analysed. {T}hey were selected as case-studies mainly because they reflected at the time of their emergence an on-going radical change in society in the realm of health and medicine. {T}herefore both sets unveil the process of legitimizing a "{C}hinese medicine" in a context of epistemological shift: such a process takes various conceptual and practical forms framed along the lines of the current dominant ideological system and constrained by socio-economic and political factors. {F}inally, issues relative to research ethics, bioethics and the {N}ew {H}ealth {R}eform guidelines raised in the 2000s, which represents also a significant historical turn for {C}hina, are discussed. {D}rawn from the overall discussion throughout the text, several concluding remarks contribute to advocate for "win-win" encounters - from the {E}ast to the {W}est and from the {S}outh to the {S}outh, and for more implementable transnational/global ethics designing.},
  keywords = {{ANTHROPOLOGIE} {DE} {LA} {SANTE} ; {SYSTEME} {DE} {SANTE} ; {MEDECINE} {TRADITIONNELLE} ; {ETHIQUE} ; {HISTOIRE} ; {SOCIETE} {PLURICULTURELLE} ; {RELATIONS} {INTERNATIONALES} ; {CONFUCIANISME} ; {SAVOIR} ; {CHINE}},
  booktitle = {{E}thnologie, m{\'e}decine et bio{\'e}thique.{P}artie {II} : la rencontre des ethnom{\'e}decines et des ethno{\'e}thiques},
  journal = {{J}ournal {I}nternational de {B}io{\'e}thique et d'{E}thique des {S}ciences},
  volume = {26},
  numero = {4},
  pages = {101--116},
  ISSN = {1287-7352},
  year = {2015},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010067327},
}