@article{fdi:010063127,
  title = {{D}ynamic ups and downs of the {H}imalaya},
  author = {{H}usson, {L}. and {B}ernet, {M}. and {G}uillot, {S}. and {H}uyghe, {P}. and {M}ugnier, {J}. {L}. and {R}eplumaz, {A}. and {R}obert, {X}avier and {V}an der {B}eek, {P}.},
  editor = {},
  language = {{ENG}},
  abstract = {{F}ast uplift and exhumation of the {H}imalaya and {T}ibet and fast subsidence in the foreland basin portray the primary {N}eogene evolution of the {I}ndian-{E}urasian collision zone. {W}e relate these events to the relative northward drift of {I}ndia over its own slab. {O}ur mantle-flow model derived from seismic tomography shows that dynamic topography over the southward-folded {I}ndian slab explains the modern location of the foreland depocenter. {B}ack in time, our model suggests that the stretched {I}ndian slab detached from the {I}ndian plate during the indentation of the {E}urasian plate, and remained stationary underneath the northward-drifting {I}ndian continent. {W}e model the associated southward migration of the dynamic deflection of the topography and show that subsidence has amounted to similar to 6000 m in the foreland basin since 15 {M}a, while the dynamic surface uplift of the {H}imalaya amounted to similar to 1000 m during the early {M}iocene. {W}hile competing with other processes, transient dynamic topography may thus explain, to a large extent, both the uplift history of the {H}imalaya and subsidence of its foreland basin, and should not be ignored.},
  keywords = {{HIMALAYA} ; {INDE} ; {TIBET} ; {NEPAL}},
  booktitle = {},
  journal = {{G}eology},
  volume = {42},
  numero = {10},
  pages = {839--842},
  ISSN = {0091-7613},
  year = {2014},
  DOI = {10.1130/g36049.1},
  URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010063127},
}