Horizon / Plein textes La base de ressources documentaires de l'IRD

IRD

 

Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Parsa S., Morse S., Bonifacio A., Chancellor T. C. B., Condori B., Crespo-Perez V., Hobbs S. L. A., Kroschel J., Ba M. N., Rebaudo François, Sherwood S. G., Vanek S. J., Faye E., Herrera M. A., Dangles Olivier. (2014). Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111 (10), 3889-3894. ISSN 0027-8424

Accès réservé (Intranet IRD) Demander le PDF

Lien direct chez l'éditeur doi:10.1073/pnas.1312693111

Titre
Obstacles to integrated pest management adoption in developing countries
Année de publication2014
Type de documentArticle référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000332564800058
AuteursParsa S., Morse S., Bonifacio A., Chancellor T. C. B., Condori B., Crespo-Perez V., Hobbs S. L. A., Kroschel J., Ba M. N., Rebaudo François, Sherwood S. G., Vanek S. J., Faye E., Herrera M. A., Dangles Olivier.
SourceProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014, 111 (10), p. 3889-3894. ISSN 0027-8424
RésuméDespite its theoretical prominence and sound principles, integrated pest management (IPM) continues to suffer from anemic adoption rates in developing countries. To shed light on the reasons, we surveyed the opinions of a large and diverse pool of IPM professionals and practitioners from 96 countries by using structured concept mapping. The first phase of this method elicited 413 open-ended responses on perceived obstacles to IPM. Analysis of responses revealed 51 unique statements on obstacles, the most frequent of which was "insufficient training and technical support to farmers." Cluster analyses, based on participant opinions, grouped these unique statements into six themes: research weaknesses, outreach weaknesses, IPM weaknesses, farmer weaknesses, pesticide industry interference, and weak adoption incentives. Subsequently, 163 participants rated the obstacles expressed in the 51 unique statements according to importance and remediation difficulty. Respondents from developing countries and high-income countries rated the obstacles differently. As a group, developing-country respondents rated "IPM requires collective action within a farming community" as their top obstacle to IPM adoption. Respondents from high-income countries prioritized instead the "shortage of well-qualified IPM experts and extensionists." Differential prioritization was also evident among developing-country regions, and when obstacle statements were grouped into themes. Results highlighted the need to improve the participation of stakeholders from developing countries in the IPM adoption debate, and also to situate the debate within specific regional contexts.
Plan de classementEconomie et sociologie rurale [098] ; Sciences du monde végétal [076]
Descr. géo.TIERS MONDE
LocalisationFonds IRD [F B010061857]
Identifiant IRDfdi:010061857
Lien permanenthttp://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010061857

Export des données

Disponibilité des documents

Télechargment fichier PDF téléchargeable

Lien sur le Web lien chez l'éditeur

Accès réservé en accès réservé

HAL en libre accès sur HAL


Accès aux documents originaux :

Le FDI est labellisé CollEx

Accès direct

Bureau du chercheur

Site de la documentation

Espace intranet IST (accès réservé)

Suivi des publications IRD (accès réservé)

Mentions légales

Services Horizon

Poser une question

Consulter l'aide en ligne

Déposer une publication (accès réservé)

S'abonner au flux RSS

Voir les tableaux chronologiques et thématiques

Centres de documentation

Bondy

Montpellier (centre IRD)

Montpellier (MSE)

Cayenne

Nouméa

Papeete

Abidjan

Dakar

Niamey

Ouagadougou

Tunis

La Paz

Quito