@article{fdi:010052901, title = {{A}re drifting {FAD}s essential for testing the ecological trap hypothesis ?}, author = {{D}agorn, {L}aurent and {H}olland, {K}. {N}. and {F}ilmalter, {J}.}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{B}ecause tropical tunas are known to aggregate around floating objects, it has been suggested that the large number of drifting fish aggregating devices ({FADS}) built and deployed by purse seiners could act as an 'ecological trap'. {T}his hypothesis states that these networks of drifting {FADS} could take fish to areas where they would not normally go or retain them in places that they would otherwise leave. {B}ecause the ecological trap hypothesis was first advanced for drifting {FAD}s, some have argued that only studies using drifting {FAD}s can test this hypothesis. {H}owever, because working with drifting {FAD}s is difficult, accepting this precept would preclude the scientific community from providing urgently needed information to organizations charged with management of fisheries that exploit drifting {FAD}s. {W}e argue that because both anchored and drifting {FAD}s alter the natural environment, the more easily accessible anchored {FAD}s can be used to test the ecological trap hypothesis. {A}lso, based on a comparative scientific approach, we argue that understanding the behaviour of tunas around anchored {FAD}s can improve our general understanding of tunas around all types of floating objects and help design new, well focused studies for drifting {FAD}s. {A}s anchored {FAD}s are easier to access and offer a greater potential for research, we encourage scientists to design and conduct studies (in particular on the behaviour of fish at {FADS}) around the moored structures.}, keywords = {{FAD} ; {E}cological trap hypothesis ; {T}unas}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{F}isheries {R}esearch}, volume = {106}, numero = {1}, pages = {60--63}, ISSN = {0165-7836}, year = {2010}, DOI = {10.1016/j.fishres.2010.07.002}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010052901}, }