Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Mahé Gil, Girard S., New M., Paturel Jean-Emmanuel, Cres A., Dezetter Alain, Dieulin Claudine, Boyer Jean-Francois, Rouché Nathalie, Servat Eric. (2008). Comparing available rainfall gridded datasets for West Africa and the impact on rainfall-runoff modelling results, the case of Burkina-Faso. Water Sa, 34 (5), p. 529-536. ISSN 0378-4738.

Titre du document
Comparing available rainfall gridded datasets for West Africa and the impact on rainfall-runoff modelling results, the case of Burkina-Faso
Année de publication
2008
Type de document
Article référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000261309000002
Auteurs
Mahé Gil, Girard S., New M., Paturel Jean-Emmanuel, Cres A., Dezetter Alain, Dieulin Claudine, Boyer Jean-Francois, Rouché Nathalie, Servat Eric
Source
Water Sa, 2008, 34 (5), p. 529-536 ISSN 0378-4738
Monthly rainfall data in Burkina-Faso, West Africa, over a period of 77 years are extracted front three different gridded data sets, available either on the web: CRU (Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, UK), SIEREM (HydroSciences Montpellier, France), or from the National Meteorological Center of Burkina-Faso. With a view to modelling the runoff rain fall relationship at the monthly time step, these data are used at the 0.5 degrees*0.5 degrees scale. Despite mean, minimum, Standard deviation and inter-annual variability being very similar for the period 1922 to 1998, the three gridded data sets used show an important spatial variability of values with time, and some differences are observed which lead to significantly different runoff-rain fail simulations. Comparison of the rainfall grids has shown that differences between the precipitation grids are more pronounced during years when the rainfall is lower; this also applies to areas where the rainfall is lower. The three different rainfall grids produce differences in mean rainfall of 4 to 11%, depending oil the grids that are compared. While these results are obviously specific to the station networks and interpolation method used, they provide an indication of the differences that call arise. It is recommended that as many stations as possible are used to better assess areal rainfall, These biases have a strong influence oil the results of the runoff-rainfall modelling (using the GR2M Conceptual model): the Nash criteria show differences of about 20% and calculated flow of 30% to 40%. This study illustrates the levels of uncertainty when using available rainfall gridded data sets, for rainfall-runoff studies in West African developing countries, which is important in the context of predicting water resources for the future from the GCM outputs for the 21(st) century.
Plan de classement
Hydrologie [062]
Localisation
Fonds IRD [F B010044225]
Identifiant IRD
fdi:010044225
Contact