@article{fdi:010037958, title = {{E}nvironmental factors influencing urchin spatial distributions on disturbed coral reefs ({N}ew {C}aledonia, {S}outh {P}acific)}, author = {{D}umas, {P}ascal and {K}ulbicki, {M}ichel and {C}hifflet, {S}. and {F}ichez, {R}enaud and {F}erraris, {J}ocelyne}, editor = {}, language = {{ENG}}, abstract = {{F}ew works have examined the relative contributions of habitat variables to the distribution of coral reef urchins. {I}n the present study, the spatial distribution of two common urchin species ({D}iadema setosum and {E}chinometra mathaei) was studied in the fringing reefs of two urban bays in {N}ew {C}aledonia ({S}outh {P}acific). {U}rchins were surveyed at 105 stations with contrasted habitat structure/anthropic disturbance levels; 32 environmental variables (water/sediment characteristics, reef structuring species) were considered. {M}oderate densities were generally observed at station scale (mean 0.5 individuals m(-2)). {T}he combination of univariate and multivariate techniques highlighted patchy distributions for {D}iadema as well as {E}chinometra, with distinct species/habitat associations; environmental gradients occurring within the bays did not seem to influence the species patterns. {F}or {D}iadema, the spatial variability was better explained by sediment type than by biotic cover; increasing densities occurred across habitats with larger sediment sizes and decreasing coral complexity/macrophytes cover. {I}n contrast, the distribution of {E}. mathaei exhibited weak relationships with habitat variables. {I}n coral reefs, small-scale heterogeneity may thus be responsible for most of urchins spatial variability.}, keywords = {coral reefs ; new {C}aledonian ; sea urchins ; spatial distribution}, booktitle = {}, journal = {{J}ournal of {E}xperimental {M}arine {B}iology and {E}cology}, volume = {344}, numero = {1}, pages = {88--100}, ISSN = {0022-0981}, year = {2007}, DOI = {10.1016/j.jembe.2006.12.015}, URL = {https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/fdi:010037958}, }