Publications des scientifiques de l'IRD

Hassenforder E., Ducrot R., Ferrand N., Barreteau Olivier, Daniell K. A., Pittock J. (2016). Four challenges in selecting and implementing methods to monitor and evaluate participatory processes : example from the Rwenzori region, Uganda. Journal of Environmental Management, 180, p. 504-516. ISSN 0301-4797.

Titre du document
Four challenges in selecting and implementing methods to monitor and evaluate participatory processes : example from the Rwenzori region, Uganda
Année de publication
2016
Type de document
Article référencé dans le Web of Science WOS:000380418700054
Auteurs
Hassenforder E., Ducrot R., Ferrand N., Barreteau Olivier, Daniell K. A., Pittock J.
Source
Journal of Environmental Management, 2016, 180, p. 504-516 ISSN 0301-4797
Participatory approaches are now increasingly recognized and used as an essential element of policies and programs, especially in regards to natural resource management (NRM). Most practitioners, decision-makers and researchers having adopted participatory approaches also acknowledge the need to monitor and evaluate such approaches in order to audit their effectiveness, support decision-making or improve learning. Many manuals and frameworks exist on how to carry out monitoring and evaluation (M&E) for participatory processes. However, few provide guidelines on the selection and implementation of M&E methods, an aspect which is also often obscure in published studies, at the expense of the transparency, reliability and validity of the study. In this paper, we argue that the selection and implementation of M&E methods are particularly strategic when monitoring and evaluating a participatory process. We demonstrate that evaluators of participatory processes have to tackle a quadruple challenge when selecting and implementing methods: using mixed-methods, both qualitative and quantitative; assessing the participatory process, its outcomes, and its context; taking into account both the theory and participants' views; and being both rigorous and adaptive. The M&E of a participatory planning process in the Rwenzori Region, Uganda, is used as an example to show how these challenges unfold on the ground and how they can be tackled. Based on this example, we conclude by providing tools and strategies that can be used by evaluators to ensure that they make utile, feasible, coherent, transparent and adaptive methodological choices when monitoring and evaluating participatory processes for NRM.
Plan de classement
Economie et sociologie rurale [098]
Description Géographique
OUGANDA
Localisation
Fonds IRD
Identifiant IRD
PAR00015075
Contact