%0 Journal Article
%9 ACL : Articles dans des revues avec comité de lecture répertoriées par l'AERES
%A Le Page, S.
%A van Belkum, A.
%A Fulchiron, C.
%A Huguet, R.
%A Raoult, Didier
%A Rolain, J. M.
%T Evaluation of the PREVIA (R) Isola automated seeder system compared to reference manual inoculation for antibiotic susceptibility testing by the disk diffusion method
%D 2015
%L PAR00013612
%G ENG
%J European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases
%@ 0934-9723
%K EUROPE
%M ISI:000360223400018
%N 9
%P 1859-1869
%R 10.1007/s10096-015-2424-8
%U https://www.documentation.ird.fr/hor/PAR00013612
%V 34
%W Horizon (IRD)
%X The disk diffusion (DD) method remains the most popular manual technique for antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) in clinical microbiology laboratories. This is because of its simplicity, reproducibility, and limited cost compared to (automated) microdilution systems, which are usually less sensitive at detecting certain important mechanisms of resistance. Here, we evaluate the PREVIA (R) Isola automated seeder system using a new protocol for spreading bacterial suspensions (eight deposits of calibrated inocula of bacteria, followed by two rounds of rotation) in comparison with manual DD reference testing on a large series of clinical and reference strains. The average time required for seeding one agar plate for DD with this new protocol was 51 s per plate, i.e., 70 agar plates/h. Reproducibility and repeatability was assessed on three reference and three randomly chosen clinical strains, as usually requested by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and was excellent compared to the manual method. The standard deviations of zones of growth inhibition showed no statistical discrimination. The correlation between the two methods, assessed using 294 clinical isolates and a panel of six antibiotics (n = 3,528 zones of growth inhibition measured), was excellent, with a correlation coefficient of 0.977. The new PREVIA (R) Isola protocol adapted for DD had a sensitivity of 99 % and a specificity of 100 % compared to the manual technique for interpreting DD as recommended by the EUCAST.
%$ 050 ; 084